I got an email today (I assume all members did?). Long-winded, but the important point was:


"Friday, October 1 was the day that gas companies were supposed to indicate their intent to participate in the bidding process for our lands. Based upon the above, we did not receive any indication of current
interest from companies that had previously expressed interest and requested
information from us."


They had been counting on the 'fair pooling' law going through, so East would be forced to lease a lot of their members....either East bidding directly or other companies bidding with the thought to sell the lease to East. Since forced pooling (I prefer that term) didn't go through, the idea went bust. I never did see how it could work. They are going to keep trying...they apparently don't get any money until they get somebody leased. Now are we all at East's mercy?


Views: 363

Replies to This Discussion

NO response at all? Am I reading this right Lynn?
That's the way I read it. It DID require a big deposit and a non-compete agreement.
Wow, it's a shock that no gasco was interested enough to even buy the list of properties (and qualify to bid).

I still don't understand the TTLC's forced pooling reasoning. Why should East lease land (at a premium) when they already have the 75% required by the draft forced pooling?

Thanks for the info. Nothing on the website yet. I wouldn't mind if a copy of the email found its way to afrenchs at ptd dot net.
Did any other TTLC members get this email? I've gotten other TTLC emails from this address, so I assume it's legit. Odd that there is nothing on their website. I'd like to verify that it's for real.
I saw on c-span 3 two nights ago that the forced pooling bill was sent back to the house for some tweaking it sure didn't sound like it was shut down?
I've read Senate Bill 1155, and there is nothing in it about pooling. It covers only the severance tax. Unless there is another bill?
What forced pooling bill? There was the Gergely/Everett (House) draft legislation but afaik no forced pooling bill has been introduced in either branch of the PA legislature.
If what you say is true Lynn then there are going to be a whole bunch of landowners very upset. They were putting their hopes on "Twin Tiers" and probably many of them who could have signed with some other outfit did not sign.

Bill L.
aka Bummy
With this news I get a feeling the East sharks have started circling and have smelled blood. Be strong. Remember, always punch a shark in the nose. Same for landmen. LOL!
Mr. Labarge,

What lease terms do you want ?

You must have a dollar amount per acre, and a royalty percentage you want on the minerals coming out, do you mind if I ask what the terms are that you would like ?

Thank You,

Rick Boyle
Mr. Labarge,

Everything you listed is reasonable. ( price, accounting audit, term, etc.)

How many contiguous acres are you associated with, or, are you in touch with? .......


Of course pipelines are an issue to sell to.


A group I was part of, developed the largest producing natural gas field in King County Texas, and later sold out all to the old Hunt- Placid group, which even later, Chesapeake bought out. Just having one pipeline to sell to, limits everyones options to get the best price for all the interest owners , working and royalty owners.

Generally as it develops out , more purchasers of product( pipelines) should get right-of-way, and become available.
Your terms sound reasonable to me too Nate.

There are a good contiguos 640 next to my acreage for a drilling unit available once Dominion problem is solved.

Bill L.
aka Bummy

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service