We have 2 wells operated by Eastern American Energy Corporation under a farm out with EQT and 1 under a lease they acquired. A couple of years ago there was a lawsuit against them, and a settlement. We stupidly signed the agreement to modify our lease to allow post production costs. However there was also a lawsuit against EQT and our lease with them was flat rate so there was no modification of lease option for us. We are paid monthly for these 3 wells. 3 months ago the checks for all 3 wells started having a deduction for "OWNER TRANS". There is a column for "OWNER REVENUE" and another for "OWNER NET ROYALTY". The revenue minus the trans = net royalty. I can see the deduction on the one where EAEC holds the lease, but not for the farmout. Those 2 wells are 1/8 royalty, not flat rate, but were not part of EAEC settlement.
Does anyone out there have this situation?
Tags:
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com