Sometimes, consequences become very clear. Nowhere is that more evident than in Brunswick, Ohio. Just days after Governor Kasich declared “jobs are our greatest moral purpose” and noted that Ohio is leading the Midwest in job creation thanks, in large, part to the continued development of the Utica Shale, it appears this newfound prosperity could be limited in Brunswick due to a resolution being entertained by the City Council.
The resolution, sponsored by Council President Pat Hanek, seeks to compel the Ohio General Assembly to repeal laws – passed years ago – that provide the state regulatory authority over oil and natural gas operations. It has caused significant controversy with the Mayor, other council members, and the business community supporting Medina County’s largest city.
Upon the introduction of the resolution, Brunswick Mayor Gary Werner warned it would be a “deterrent” to economic development and also noted “In many ways this is an old issue, and from my perspective it continues to be somewhat dubious.”
Now, as the rest of Ohio sees economic promise, it appears the Mayor may have been right. The CEO of Philpot Rubber, a company that has doubled in size since 2009 and was recently recognized for being in Brunswick for over 100 years, announced the resolution could force it to move one of its fastest growing businesses outside the city limits.
At a press conference earlier this week, Philpott’s CEO had this to say:
This unnecessary legislation will make Brunswick a poster child for those that are anti-business in general and specifically anti-energy exploration and production. Since providing environmentally friendly products to this industry is a key growth component of the Company’s strategic plan, Philpott will be forced to locate its new wholesale operation outside of Brunswick to avoid the requirement of placing the DOT required placard on its vehicles that would say “Brunswick, OH” on them
–Mike Baach, Philpott (Resolution passage could affect Philpott’s future plans in Brunswick, 2/19/13)
Baach would go on to add:
We’re here, we’re loyal and we’re a part of the community… the publicity (passage of the resolution would bring) would put a huge burden on us.
I cannot imagine our shale gas customers wanting to deal with a company that boasts of supporting an anti-energy city
–Mike Baach, Philpott (Resolution passage could affect Philpott’s future plans in Brunswick, 2/19/13)
Mr. Baach is not alone in his discontent. The Brunswick Chamber of Commerce joined him in protesting the resolution at a city council hearing earlier this month.
The reason Brunswick’s business community opposes the legislation is simple. The City of Medina has little likelihood of seeing any Utica Shale development and this political statement will end up costing the city much-needed tax revenues and job growth.
READ THE REST: http://www.eidohio.org/as-ohio-takes-flight-brunswicks-future-becom...
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com
You need to be a member of GoMarcellusShale.com to add comments!
Join GoMarcellusShale.com