Just curious if anybody has seen continued work by Shell at the old Horsehead plant. By the same token, has anybody heard any rumblings as to how things are coming along?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Trapper on June 15, 2015 at 2:42pm
Permalink Reply by craig on June 15, 2015 at 7:10pm I was told that when the pipeline coming N from the Houston processing plant(I believe) permitted for a line going under the Ohio River nearby the Horsehead property a couple years ago, that 5 lines under the river were permitted at the time...using only one. Who permitted them and for what use, I don't know. Maybe it isn't even true. I wonder if there is a website one could find out info on??? Probably US Army Corps of Engineers might as they control what goes on, in and under the rivers. I don't really have the time to dig, sorry folks.
Permalink Reply by Gary on July 9, 2015 at 1:09am Articles are little dated but still interesting. Some of the permits that are discussed have been approved.
http://www.talltimbergroup.com/images/bg_may_june_2015_lowres.pdf
Permalink Reply by Trapper on July 21, 2015 at 1:03pm
Permalink Reply by craig on July 21, 2015 at 2:44pm I suppose as late as they can to avoid giving more time for the crazies to coagulate into a mass of onsite protesters ; )
I don't know what to think now. I thought June/July would be it.
Permalink Reply by cattlerancher on July 21, 2015 at 3:23pm http://marcellus.com/news/id/113254/shell-spend-40-million-relocate...
Before you read the article pay particular attention to the LAST sentence. (“In the event that Shell declines to build the cracker plant, Duquesne Light will not relocate the existing transmission lines.”) The great news is that they are in fact moving the 138kv lines now!! Duquesne Light did not want to run 2 lines running parallel to I-376 unless Shell agreed to build the plant. Since they are moving the lines I conclude that Shell has already committed to the project and Duquesne Light knows it. Duquesne just can't say anything because of a confidentiality agreement. My guess is that Shell will make it public in the month of August and definitely no later than December. At the end of the day, I don't care what month they announce it in 2015 I just want them to build it.
Permalink Reply by Bob Moran on July 21, 2015 at 4:41pm Nice bit of detective work. I have to agree with your conclusion.
Permalink Reply by Nancy LeNau on July 30, 2015 at 4:35pm Todd, Went by the Shell Place today.......NOTHING......and I mean NOTHING and No One there ! EMPTY .....
I go by there every day and it has been sooo busy !!! TODAY....NOTHING ! STRANGE ......... Has me a bit confused.......
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
Brett replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com