Anyone have success wording a Lease Agreement so that the Lessee MUST include a pre-set percentage of your acreage in any royalty producing drilling unit? In other words - they lease your 100 acres then only claim they are incorporating 20 acres into a drilling unit, and your reduced royalties are based on the 20 acres not 100...so what if they later have to release the other non-used 80 acres - IF they control the ingress/egress/ best access points AND who the hell knows what they're are doing under there ESPECIALLY with all the changing technologies! - what legal assurance can be lease protected to make certain they have to use a higher percentage of the 100 acres, or at least pay royalties on it - and/or that ANYTHING they do won't adversely affect the re-leasing value of the remaining lease-freed (due to non-production) 80 acres???
Anybody have a great PUGH CLAUSE you care to share?
Thanks all!
Tags:
The SURE group lease included both horizontal and vertical PUGH clauses.
The Pugh clause is so important I only know that because I have been on the bad end of a Pugh clause. In wetzel co we are in a unit where as the bore path runs through our property and they cut 4acres out of the unit and didn't pay us 1ft on the other side of the bore path.. I'll give you 3 guesses and the first 2 don't count who this was. I have contacted them many times only for them to tell me after months they will just use RULE OF CAPTURE.
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com