Published in Sunday's Indiana Gazette:

 

http://www.indianagazette.com/a_opinions/article_793f60cc-f005-58dc... 

 

Brilliantly written piece on the potential impact of a hydrofracturing spill at a proposed well site near a lake outside of Indiana County, PA. 

 

MIKE KNAPP: Examining worst case scenario at Yellow Creek

A man much wiser than me once observed that people tend to fear that which they do not understand. Let's take a look at a worst case scenario that could arise from a drilling accident at our planned James Ray gas well.

 

For our example, let's assume an incident like what Chesapeake faced recently in Bradford since it's a recent and widely publicized case.

 

A flange on the wellhead breaks during fracking, and frack water begins to douse the well site. Lets assume (and this is a big assumption) that our spill control plan is somehow overwhelmed, allowing 10,000 gallons of frack water to escape the well pad and run out onto the soil. For simplicity's sake, let's assume that all of the 10,000 gallons successfully travel the approximate 2,000-plus-feet distance between the pad and the shore, entering Yellow Creek Lake.

 

First, let's take a look at what all is in that 10,000 gallons of frack fluid:

  • Fracking fluid is 99.5 percent water and playground sand. The remaining half of a percent breaks down as follows: (typical chemical mix in fracking fluid, sourced from http://www.energyindepth.com)
  • Hydrochloric acid: 0.123 percent (12.3 gallons). The largest chemical constituent. Very scary name, but very benign when diluted. Hydrochloric acid is the preferred additive to lower the pH in public swimming pools. Millions of gallons of hydrochloric acid are poured, undiluted, into public swimming pools every year.
  • Petroleum distillate: 0.088 percent (8.8 gallons). Petroleum distillates are found in every-day products such as candy, laxatives and make-up remover.
  • Isopropanol: 0.085 percent (8.5 gallons). Another scary sounding name. But you might know it better by its other name: rubbing alcohol.
  • Potassium chloride: 0.06 percent (6 gallons). Used as a low sodium table salt substitute, and used as an alternative to salt in water softener systems.
  • Guar gum: 0.056 percent (5.6 gallons). Most common use is in the food industry as a thickening agent. You'll find it in ice cream, salad dressings, toothpaste and many other food items.
  • Ethylene glycol: 0.043 percent (4.3 gallons). This is one of the not so nice chemicals in fracking. It is defined as moderately toxic. It's the primary constituent of automotive antifreeze.
  • Sodium carbonate: 0.011 percent (1.1 gallon). Another staple in the swimming pool industry. It is often referred to as soda ash, and is the most common way to raise the pH in a swimming pool.
  • Sodium chloride: 0.01 percent (1 gallon). Table salt.
  • Borate salts: 0.007 percent (less than 3 quarts). Used as a food additive/preservative and as a pH buffer in swimming pools.
  • Citric acid: 0.004 percent (less than 2 quarts). Lemon juice; food additive
  • N,n-dimethyl formamide: 0.002 percent (about 32 fluid ounces). Used as an industrial solvent; long-term exposure to this chemical has been linked to cancer in some studies and is thought to cause birth defects, but is not listed as a known carcinogen by the EPA.
  • Glutaraldehyde: 0.001 percent (about 16 fluid ounces). This chemical is used for surgical disinfection and as a biocide to kill algae while not harming surrounding aquatic life.

Now, to further put this into a perspective that is easy to wrap your head around, let's reduce these numbers to the equivalent of contamination were they to enter a standard 25,000 gallon swimming pool.

 

Yellow Creek Lake is 720 acres. Assuming an average depth of 10 feet, that would put the volume at 2.35 billion gallons. As such, the equivalent amounts in a swimming pool would be as follows:

 

Hydrochloric acid: 1.09 drops; petroleum distillate: 2/3rds drop; isopropanol: 2/3rds drop; potassium chloride: ᄑ drop; guar gum: ᄑ drop; ethylene glycol: 1/3rd drop;

 

Sodium carbonate: 1/10th drop; sodium chloride: 1/10th drop; borate salts: 1/16th drop; citric acid: 1/25th drop; dimethyl formamide : 1/50th drop; and glutaraldehyde: 1/100th drop.

 

This does not account for the fact that there is a large flow of water into the lake that would further dilute the contamination. Nor does it account for the fact that most if not all of that 10,000 gallons would be soaked up in the topsoil, and most likely would not even reach Yellow Creek Lake at all.

 

As you can see, the numbers we are talking about here would not present a "catastrophic" situation as has been haphazardly stated by the Central Indiana County Water Authority. There is serious doubt as to whether there would even be any impact at all.

 

Would you drain your swimming pool and replace the water with fresh water if you knew 1/3 of a drop of anti-freeze were to fall into it? You would have to drink 100 swimming pools worth of water to ingest one drop of the most dangerous constituent in the fracturing mix.

 

In the history of Marcellus shale drilling, no such incidents have occurred with vertical Marcellus shale drilling (the kind that is being proposed near Yellow Creek), which uses much lower pressures and much smaller volumes of water.

 

Mike Knapp is president of Knapp Acquisitions & Production, LLC, of Kittanning.

Views: 915

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have to admit Mike, you did a great service by running down all those numbers and then presenting a logical scenario that the 'average joe' will be able to understand.

This needs posted on every anti drilling website out there!

 

Great job Mike, now let all the uneducated environmentalists top this one.  We need more information like this to stop scaring people.  There are probabally more pollutants going into that waterway from leaks from boats, vehicles, septics that are not up to standards and fertilizers being used on lands around the waterway.  Keep up the good work.
Thanks Karen.  Pass the link around if you don't mind.  The more that hear the truth, the better!
Mike; tried four times to open link but to no avail.  Was the site hacked?

Try this, the link was truncated in Mike's post....

 

http://www.indianagazette.com/a_opinions/article_793f60cc-f005-58dc...

 

 

Thanks Craig  worked fine

 

Mike; great job. A very informative article that puts in proper perspective. I would even say brilliant....but you beat me to it!

Just the ole Geek coming out in me!

 

Haha I don't know about brilliant, just some simple math.   Thanks for the kind words.
Good job Mike.  Keep up the good work.  Too many ignorant people who want to speak before they learn the facts. 
Mike,  doubt you will see the article reprinted in any environmental magazines, but thanks for taking the time to do the research and tell the truth.  Btw, two average auto radiator hose failures would release about that much Ethylene glycol.
Good article and good analysis.  Any facts on the additional elements that come back up in the fracing water from the Marcellus or Utica strata?
Flowback water (the water that comes back immediately after fracking) is pretty free of anything nasty, but the produced water that comes out over the lifespan of the well is extremely salty (brine) and can contain some NORM's (naturally occurring radioactive materials).   Not really in any levels that are of any concern.  Back when PA was still allowing municipal water treatment plants to discharge into waterways without treating for NORM, they did extensive testing downstream of the discharges.  Every test but one came back negative except for one that was still 80% below levels of concern.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service