Tags:
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 12, 2012 at 4:36pm Watch this video for a better idea of how horizontal drilling is done
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 13, 2012 at 1:28am Every well has its own permit. There are 2 permitted on the 701 pad and 5 permitted on the 702 pad site.
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 13, 2012 at 2:02am Plat maps for the 2 newly permitted wells on Unit 701
Permalink Reply by Sam Moore on April 13, 2012 at 5:16am Those are great. Any chance you have a plat of unit 702. I can sit on the deck and watch them building the pad for 702 but am not for sure if it is going to hit me very much if at all.
Permalink Reply by Sam Moore on April 13, 2012 at 9:42am No, Randy is east of the 701 pad and I'm west of the 702 pad.
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 13, 2012 at 10:39am The plats for pad 702 are not online with ODNR yet. Since the permits were just posted last week, it may be a little while before the plats show up on the website.
Permalink Reply by Sam Moore on April 14, 2012 at 3:31am Yes you are correct Randy is west of 701 and I am east of 702. I have the farm next to Randys dad on Straightfork. As to what the well is producing it varies with who you talk to from dry gas only to 300 barrels of oil a day. Until they get a line in to move the gas and start sending out royalty checks no one is going to know for sure what it is doing. Dom. is taking some gas but won't take it all.
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 14, 2012 at 6:51am More like 3-6 million to put one in production.
Permalink Reply by Sam Moore on April 14, 2012 at 3:34am Thanks Finnbear
I know seeing it on a map is not going to change anything but with it so close it does have me very interested and 703 looks to be even more promissing.
Permalink Reply by Sam Moore on April 16, 2012 at 2:17am 702 is located in Section 23 between CR 14 ( Long Run) and TR 280 ( Straightfork Rd)
703 is going to be in Section 18 between TR 280 and CR 12. This would qualify as rumor at this time as no permits have been pulled.
Permalink Reply by Tom L A. on April 14, 2012 at 10:05am I can assure you guys that the money that was spent on the first whitacre well approached 8 figures, if it didnt hit 8 figures...this was of course due to sidetracking that had to be done.
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com