Tags:
Permalink Reply by SA Frank on May 6, 2012 at 1:23am Strikes me that lawyers have charged between $500-$700 in the past and usually not based on acreage. This sounds like a bad deal to me and another way to delay landowners 3-6 months while the title searches are done. On top of it, most oil companies will probably re-run title searches before they drop coin anyway. I don't fault Des for not bringing in a deal, but have become increasingly discouraged by his methods and tactics. I have said it before, Monroe is going to be a tough place to get leased. Probably won't be any serious large buying until either XTO or Antero proves up their acreage. Otherwise we will continue with the nibbling off by select areas.
SA that sounds more in line . Do you know if that would be a patent title search ?
I think Monroe is going to be a good area from the info that has been shared with me .
Lets keep our fingers crossed .
Permalink Reply by SA Frank on May 6, 2012 at 2:10am Ridgeman - no I don't think those would be patent title searches, which I would assume means that the title search goes all the way back to the land grant? I am not sure why Des would feel the need to do this, seems to me just clearing the title back to the early to mid 1900's should be sufficient to give the buyers a 'warm and fuzzy'. Once they buy the lease they can take it as far back as they want. However any issues at that point would probably be minimal. That seems like overkill to me.
So I guess Des is trying to say that even though I had a title search on my mineral rights...it isn't good enough and I should still pay him and his investor for this 'new and improved' title search?? No way.
I wasn't at the meeting so I am getting this third hand from this board, but from what I am smelling...it stinks. Maybe I missed something on why this is needed, feel free to correct me. I got to think that the other landgroup in Monroe is going to add some acreage in the coming weeks.
Permalink Reply by SA Frank on May 6, 2012 at 3:56am Bill, No information on the whitacre well. Last I had heard it was dry. Someone told me that the pipeline wasn't finished to carry away the gas, but I don't know. Someone might be able to confirm this. Once under production the well could start producing some liquids, but if it really was dry before...it probably won't be the amounts that most would hope for.
Would be surprised if HG wanted to sell themselves yet or if someone wanted to buy them. if they feel they have liquids, most certainly they would want some big numbers for their acreage and there seems to be some acreage available in Monroe that no one is biting on yet. Obviously XTO or Anterro would be good fits, but XTO doesn't seem to be in a hurry lease anymore major acreage until they drill their own wells and Anterro hasn't veered from the NW corner of Monroe. Just my opinions, not much to back it up.
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 27, 2012 at 2:23am nick c cionee or nick j cinai or Nick J. Ciani ????
cell # 216-219-6846 (Cleveland?)
http://www.bbb.org/cleveland/business-reviews/contractor-remodel-an...
Nick you know exactly that is me & that I asked you don't call me anymore or e mail me and I removed you from my e mail updates, But Im even more confused now, You don't live down here and you don't own property down here?
Permalink Reply by Sam Moore on May 28, 2012 at 2:37am Rumors are running a muck. I will leave those alone and just put in couple of facts. HG stopped working on their second well pad site and does not plan to start drilling again until NG is over $4. They have put forth an offer to extend the leases they have for 5 more years. Those that decide not to extend their lease will expire Dec. 31st.
Permalink Reply by Rec on May 28, 2012 at 3:29am
Permalink Reply by Sam Moore on May 28, 2012 at 4:00am Donna
I can see the second well pad from my property and watched them pull out. Then I got a letter from HG stating what they wanted to do.
Permalink Reply by Rec on May 28, 2012 at 7:59am
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com