Letters to the editor - Feb. 2


www.ohio.com/MAI/1.258075/E/prod/AT/A" width="1" height="1"/>

I take issue with Professor Robert W. Chase’s Jan. 25 commentary that people who are concerned about the safety and environmental impacts of shale drilling are spreading myths (“Five myths about ‘fracking’ ”).

We know with certainty that the oil and gas industry is not capable of extracting and processing shale oil and gas safely. In Pennsylvania alone, companies drilling in the Marcellus shale were cited over 1,600 times for violating state regulations between Jan. 1, 2008, and Aug. 20, 2010.

The Pennsylvania Land Trust Association identified 1,056 as likely to endanger the environment or the safety of communities.

The categories include, among others, improper discharge of industrial waste, faulty pollution-prevention practices, inadequate blowout prevention and improper well-casing construction.

Chesapeake, which has drilled the most wells in the Marcellus shale, has the most violations, and, just last year, was given Pennsylvania’s largest-ever fine (more than $1 million) to an oil and gas company for contaminating the water supplies of 16 families in Bradford County.

There’s no reason to expect the drilling companies’ record to improve in Ohio.

Evidence is consistently being reported of drilling’s threats to water supplies, air and health. Duke scientists report in Scientific American that the closer drinking water wells are to active natural gas wells, the more likely it is that methane contamination will occur.

Award-winning biologist Sandra Steingraber, testifying before the New York Assembly on the adequacy of its new regulations, warns that every phase of the drilling process has the potential to increase the risk of bladder, lung and breast cancer and other serious diseases.

As communities become aware of the growing dangers, more and more are either banning or declaring a moratorium on drilling. Those that ban see the transformation of their environments into heavy industrial zones and the risks to health and safety as unacceptable.

Those that declare moratoriums seek time to strengthen and revise their regulations and wait for the federal Environmental Protection Agency studies assessing the safety of shale drilling, due to come out this year.

Unlike other states, Ohio permits shale drilling before revising its regulations. Gov. Kasich pledges to strengthen regulations, but not to scare business away. I fear we are likely to get the “strongest regulations” industry is willing to approve.

Ralph P. Cebulla

Professor emeritus, Hiram College

Hiram

Views: 490

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Dutch Hollow,

Your esteemed biologist, Sandra Steingraber, claims many things that bear a closer look. In her letter last fall to Governor Cuomo she wrote:

 

Hydraulic fracturing introduces cancer risks from the start and into perpetuity.

Cancercausing chemicals are associated with all stages of the high-volume hydraulic fracturing process,

from the production and use of fracking fluids, to the release of radioactive and other naturally

hazardous materials from the shale, to transportation- and drilling-related air pollution, to the

disposal of contaminated wastewater. The potential for accidents during the injection and

transportation of fracking chemicals concerns us deeply. And, as data from other states clearly

demonstrate, the storage, treatment and disposal of the contaminated water can be a source of

human exposure to chemical carcinogens and their precursors (Volz, 2011). In addition, the

industrialization of the landscape and congestion of small communities with truck traffic impairs

the safety and healthfulness of outdoor exercise. Regular exercise is an important, established

risk reducer for many cancers, including breast cancer (Bernstein, 2009).

 

In this very letter she makes many references to the NYS SGEIS. She must therefore know that the state proposes to utilize closed-loop fracking systems. With a closed system in place, the above paragraph is a physical impossibilty. You are asking me to hold her up as an expert? She is also a professor at Ithaca College and a frequent author to the Huffington Post. Any chance she has a pre-disposed bias?

Respectfully,

Dave

Hold on a minute, last summer I was hiking in the Finger Lakes Region in NY State and a Bigfoot (sasqwatch.. to the rest of us) told me he saw Prof's. Cebulla and Steingraber hiking together and they seemed like a really nice couple. He was impressed.

Tidy'd up their campsite perfectly.

These clowns never give a break down of the violations.  It could be things like trucks leaving mud on a road, a silt fence being down, or less than three feet of freeboard on the water containment compound.  Even a leaky head gasket on an engine can be a violation. They should be forced to give a detailed breakdown of the violations.

 

The Duke study was seriously flawed as it had no pre-drilling baseline tests and the area of study has a long history of methane in the water. One aquifer, the Lockhaven, is well known for high methane levels.  http://www.ogj.com/1/vol-109/issue-49/exploration-development/metha...

In addition thermogenic methane, often used as an identifier of Marcellus gas contamination,  can also be found in some coal beds.   http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/futuresupply/coalbedng...

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service