I suppose it depends what kind or property you have to lease. As I understand it, the PUGH CLAUSE allows the landowner to set aside certain areas that he does not want disturbed in any, way, shape or form. Am I correct in my understanding?
Also other gas or oil deposits in another and lower layer are not to be exploited without a new lease unless they are specifically included in the original lease.
I can understand why drillers would not want this clause included. They would then be hampered from much deeper drilling then the land owner is expecting them to drill.
Bill L.
aka Bummy
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on July 10, 2010 at 2:59pm
Permalink Reply by William Ladd on July 10, 2010 at 3:06pm
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on July 11, 2010 at 9:50am
Permalink Reply by William Ladd on July 12, 2010 at 12:12am
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on July 12, 2010 at 12:50am
Gary Barnhart replied to paul cavaliere's discussion 'advice on mineral rights and selling a property'
Jim Pollock replied to Jim Pollock's discussion 'New well going in on tower road' in the group Columbiana County, OH
Jim Pollock replied to Jim Pollock's discussion 'Red Rock Energy' in the group Columbiana County, OH
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com