For anyone interested, I have attached the Halterlein Well Plats from Mercer Township, Butler County. It looks like 11 wells from the same pad.
5 horizontals headed northwest, and 6 horizontals headed southeast.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by cheliped on January 15, 2013 at 3:16pm Oliver,
As i look over the different plats i notice that they are all different sizes. It seems that the smallest is 195 acres and the largest is 450+. I know the largest size depends on the lease - either 640 or 1280, but I am wondering how small a unit can be. any info would be greatly appreciated.
Permalink Reply by Oliver Perry on January 16, 2013 at 2:40am cheliped,
I really don't know any more about it than you, but I think they generally have a 500' minimum on each side of the horizontal, and a 500' radius around the top hole. So for a single well, with a 5,000' long horizontal leg, I would assume the smallest a unit could be would be about 1,000' X 5,500' or 126 acres.
Obviously, a shorter lateral would reduce the minimum unit size, but I think 5,000' is about average.
Permalink Reply by cheliped on January 16, 2013 at 7:28am
Permalink Reply by Tim Tarr on January 16, 2013 at 9:07am Oliver,
Thanks for posting that. SWEPI sure has better well plats than RRC.
Permalink Reply by cheliped on January 16, 2013 at 10:40am Tim,
Does RRC have small unit sizes? if so what are the the unit acre size?
Permalink Reply by Oliver Perry on January 16, 2013 at 4:57pm cheliped,
I have attached two Chesapeake unit maps from over in Ohio, one is only 104 acres, the other 129 acres. Check them out.
Permalink Reply by cheliped on January 17, 2013 at 1:45am The big question now is why are the units so small? I always thought that it was not economical for them to drill such small units.
Permalink Reply by Oliver Perry on January 17, 2013 at 3:14am I would guess they start out small with only one well as sort of a test well to find out the potential for the area. The units can always be enlarged in the future if the well has good production, and they decide to drill additional wells. I think the pads are built to a size with this possible unit enlargement in mind.
The unit maps show a sketch of the pad, and that shows the possible future wells.
Permalink Reply by cheliped on January 17, 2013 at 3:25am
Permalink Reply by Oliver Perry on January 17, 2013 at 3:49am Using the Halterlein site as an example, the permitting for those wells started last July. Yet Swepi was still leasing around that site up until a couple of months ago. I think they were still gathering the final parcels needed to form their units.
So if somebody has an unleased parcel in close proximity to a new well that is in the permitting process, that puts them in a very good position for negotiating a lease with the operator of that new well.
I hope to be in that very situation sometime in the next couple of years because my acreage is currently not leased.
Permalink Reply by FairMktValue on July 31, 2013 at 12:58am Interesting lookiing at the pad sketch. Wells marked HM, HD and HS.
I believe you may have mentioned this somewhere but I am assuming HM would be marcellus D & S - other strata.?
Like a broken record, that gets me back to "stacked pays" . Lot of value there that they just don't want to pay for.
Permalink Reply by Oliver Perry on July 31, 2013 at 10:10am M is for Marcellus, D is for Utica, and S is for Burket.
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com