Tags:
Permalink Reply by Jeanette Krunich on April 13, 2011 at 10:48am Probably. I spoke with a man from CPK who was in Washington Township doing some land assessment and seeing what the interest may be. I asked if they were interested in the Utica Shale and he said "probably". Seemed to be talking first with people who held larger acreage.
Permalink Reply by Jeanette Krunich on April 14, 2011 at 10:26am
Permalink Reply by Jeanette Krunich on April 15, 2011 at 3:01am
Permalink Reply by Allen Kraft on April 15, 2011 at 10:02am 5000 per acre
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-14/chesapeake-may-seek-partne...
snip
Agreements to lease land in Trumbull County started at a few hundred dollars an acre and have grown to $5,000, Marchese said. Recent buyers have paid as much as $20,000 an acre for land in the Texas’s Eagle Ford shale area and the Bakken shale in North Dakota, which produce oil and gas liquids, Hanold said.
snip
Permalink Reply by Josh on May 15, 2011 at 3:17pm James,
I agree with you we need to keep getting the word out and have landowners hold off. If people continue to sign the offers wont go up. Everyone needs to relax and watch things develope. CHK isn't going anywhere with black gold under our feet.
I posted this on on another topic but since it seems to be a recurring thread thought I would post here too. Not affiliated with anyone but this is my story from the Marcellus in PA:
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com