the times leader on Saturday  states oxford oil lease are invalid   it states that all oil gas leases which are leased in perpetuity are void from the beginning,  vavra said more need to follow suit

Views: 2644

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Interesting that another company has had their perpetual lease challenged and the Common Pleas Judge rules in favor of the landowner. 

Heard rumor last week that the Appeals Court Decision regarding Beck Energy's perpetual leases will probably occur around November 20th. 

I heard a rumor that there is group of Oxford/Eclipse leaseholders forming in northern Noble to negotiate bonus $ with Eclipse over the 160 acre pooling clause in their leases.   I imagine this group would be ripe for a class action to exploit the perpetual clause, especially with the suit in Monroe county with Beck to support the claim (landowners will win the appeal).

Why are these groups not posting to encourage more members of the group?  How about an attorney out there wanting to file a class action?

It's easier to form a group to amend the leases and get better terms from Eclipse than it is to build a class action and spend potentially years in court sorting it out.  

Chesapeake Appalachia wins class action lawsuit

Frankovitch

WHEELING – A federal judge has granted Chesapeake Appalachia’s motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit filed against it by a Hancock County woman.

On Aug. 21, U.S. District Judge Frederick Stamp, of the Northern District of West Virginia, ruled for the company in Vaunie Brown’s class action lawsuit. Brown was challenging the company’s decision to exercise an option in her oil and gas lease that allows the company to use her land for five more years.

Brown’s original agreement was with Great Lakes Energy Partners, which assigned the lease to Chesapeake Appalachia. Because no drilling occurred during the lease’s initial five-year term, the defendant should not be able to renew or extend it, she argued.

“(T)he plaintiff argues that, if the relevant sentence of Paragraph 19 (of the lease agreement) grants the defendant a unilateral right to extend the Lease under the same terms, it violates the rule against perpetuities, as it would give Chesapeake an unfettered ability to extend the lease in perpetuity,” Stamp wrote.

“This argument fails as a matter of West Virginia law. West Virginia courts have consistently found that extension and renewal clauses in leases, barring the inclusion of language ‘so plain as to admit no doubt of the purpose to provide for a perpetual renewal,’ grant the lessee a right to a single renewal or extension.”

Brown’s lawsuit also sought damages for what she said was tortious behavior on the part of Chesapeake Appalachia relating to the lease.

In 2007, Brown entered into the oil and gas lease with Great Lakes Energy Partners. It had a primary term of five years and contained a lease extension provision in Paragraph 19.

The provision stated: “Upon expiration of this lease and within sixty days thereinafter, Lessor grants to Lessee an option to extend or renew under similar terms a like lease.”

In the five years after the agreement was reached, no drilling took place on Brown’s property. Great Lakes assigned the lease to Chesapeake Appalachia, too.

Thirteen days before the lease’s expiration, Chesapeake Appalachia filed a notice of extension and gave Brown a bonus payment of $1,000. Her lawsuit followed in Hancock Circuit Court, and the defendant removed it to federal court.

I just had a meeting with Joe Vavra today.  He was one of the lawyers handling the case against Oxford.  Read about it in another post I made, here...Scare Tactics or Fact, Is Eclipse right?

This perpetual lease language is in a lot of the old HBP leases too, most of them in fact.

Does anybody know the status of the pending appeal of this case?

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service