Yea votes stand with the land owners of Pennsylvania, Nays do not!!!! We landowners need to support those who support us. We cannot forget these people who fight for what's right for the people of Pennsylvania. The fight isn't over yet.
Let's thank Rep. Garth Everett for sponsoring this legislation
Phone: (717) 787-5270
E-Mail: geverett@pahousegop.com
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/RCC/PUBLIC/listVoteSummar...
Tags:
Exactly, p g guy. This is what I alluded to earlier, a comment which unfortunately drew only responses rooted in politics. I don't know Kathy Rapp, but I'm betting she is from WPA. And concerns she might have voiced regarding conventional wells are completely in line with my (albeit vague) understanding of the potential negative impact for WPA landowners.
Once again, I live in NEPA so I don't well understand the concerns from a WPA perspective; I don't have a handle on the technicalities and details. But your post has helped shed some light and I thank you. It's a pity certain individuals, and perhaps even some living in WPA, are so quick to assign an ulterior motive to the votes of WPA Republicans in this matter before bothering to obtain the real facts of the issue from a WPA viewpoint!
The shallow oil and gas wells (less than 2500' ) of NWPA are mostly small co. or mom and pop operations. When Act 13 was passed one set of state regulations were made for both conventional and unconventional wells. This has created a very real hardship on shallow well producers. The issues between the two types of wells is as different as night and day. I personally believe there should not be any deductions from a 12.5% royalty on any type of well in PA. Maybe Kathy Rapp is just being causes after passage of Act 13
Deer spotter please explain the hardship and how act 13 impacted them. I would like to be informed and understand why Rapp voted Nay
Philip Frist I would like to say I don't own or operate any wells. From what I hear in this area of NWPA Act 13 has made it more costly for disposal of the well brine. This is not the same as flowback from unconventional wells, but has to be treated as such. The minimum size of the well pad was increased. Well pipe and well tubing can no longer be sold at the local scrap yard. Local groups are working to have act 13 amended for shallow wells. I'm not from Kathy Rapp's district so I can not say for sure, but could be she wants to make sure it will it will not effect the local producers. Hope this helps
Thank You Deer spotter
xxx
What are the details of this victory statement? What did landowners win?
HB 1684 FINALLY PASSED A VOTE IN THE STATE ENERGY COMMITTEE TO BRING IT OUT FOR A FULL HOUSE VOTE.THE FULL HOUSE VOTE HAS NOT HAPPENED YET.THIS BILL IS THE MINIMUM ROYALTY ACT GUARANTEEING ROYALTY OWNERS 1/8 OF THE GAS PRODUCED AND ALSO RESTRICTS HOW THEY CAN PAY US FOR MARKETED GAS.ALSO, NO SEVERANCE TAX CAN BE DEDUCTED FROM LANDOWNERS ROYALTY[THIS IS A BIG ONE].
O&G Guy There is at least one more company. Can not post the name due to litigation.
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com