http://www.businessweek.com/printer/articles/198474-junk-bonds-fuel...

Rice Energy (RICE), a natural gas producer with a low credit rating, raised $900 million in a bond sale in April, $150 million more than it originally sought. Investors snapped up the bonds even though the Canonsburg (Pa.)-based company has lost money three years in a row, has drilled fewer than 50 wells (most named after superheroes and monster trucks), and said it will spend $4.09 for every dollar it earns (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) in 2014.

“This is a melting ice cube business. If you’re not growing production, you’re dying.”—Mike Kelly, Global Hunter Securities

The U.S. drive for energy independence is backed by a surge in junk bonds that has been as vital to the boom as the breakthroughs in drilling technology. While the high-yield debt market has doubled in size since the end of 2004, the amount issued by exploration and production companies has grown ninefold, according to Barclays (BCS). That’s what keeps the shale revolution going even as companies spend money far faster than they make it. “There’s a lot of Kool-Aid that’s being drunk now by investors,” says Tim Gramatovich, chief investment officer of Peritus Asset Management. “People lose their discipline. They stop doing the math. They stop doing the accounting. They’re just dreaming the dream, and that’s what’s happening with the shale boom.”

Rice Energy’s April bond offering was rated CCC+ by Standard & Poor’s (MHFI), seven steps below investment grade. S&P says that of the 97 energy exploration and production companies it grades 75 are rated below investment grade. Because investor demand was so strong, Rice was able to borrow at 6.25 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That compares with 9.5 percent paid on other bonds with similar ratings. “Who can, or will want to, fund the drilling of millions of acres and hundreds of thousands of wells at an ongoing loss?” Ivan Sandrea, a research associate at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies in England, wrote in a March report. “The benevolence of the U.S. capital markets cannot last forever.”

Rice Energy will outspend its revenue through 2015, according to Moody’s Investors Service (MCO). The company says it plans to invest $1.2 billion this year in pipelines, land, and drilling in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale and in the nearby Utica shale. Its first well in the Utica failed, resulting in an $8.1 million write-off last year. Even so, Rice canceled the last of four planned presentations to investors in April because demand for its bonds was so strong, according to Gray Lisenby, Rice’s chief financial officer, who says the company could have borrowed more than $3 billion.

Rice was able to borrow so easily because of the quality of its holdings and its drilling record in the Marcellus shale, Lisenby says. “Asset quality and operational success drive returns,” he says. “Investors are pretty smart in recognizing this.”

About $156 billion will be spent on oil and gas exploration and production in the U.S. this year, according to a December report by Barclays. That’s 8.5 percent more than last year and outpaces this year’s expected 6.1 percent growth in global oil and gas expenditures, the report said. Since output from shale wells drops sharply in the first year, producers have to keep drilling more wells just to maintain production. That means more borrowing. “This is a melting ice cube business,” says Mike Kelly, an energy analyst at Global Hunter Securities in Houston. “If you’re not growing production, you’re dying.”

The recent battering of Forest Oil (FST) shows how the borrow-drill strategy can backfire. Forest generated $1.3 billion by selling assets in 2013 to pay down debt and finance its drilling as it focused on its Eagle Ford acreage. In February the company reported disappointing well results. Forest didn’t have enough revenue coming in to keep from running afoul of its debt agreements. Both S&P and Moody’s cut its credit outlook to negative. The way the shale boom is being financed is “a perfect setup for investors to lose a lot of money,” Gramatovich says. “The model is unsustainable.”

Views: 2676

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm gonna be a hard sell on your (and Jesse's) sudden 180 degree defense of junk bonds Dex.

Maybe it would turn my head 180 degrees too if I were one of the lucky ones to realize a distribution !

It would take something like that I think !

lol

Not defending junk bonds at all.  I'm just saying that the investment flows from big money into the pockets of the little guy and that's ultimately a good thing.

Still sounds quite a bit like it's in defense of 'junk bonds' to me; but being a little guy, and if it works to benefit me and mine, I would close an eye to the negative aspects of it all as well.

Nothing can be done about it anyway, especially by the little guy(s) - it is what it is - and that's what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-02/junk-bonds-funding-shale-b...

Junk Bonds Backing Shale Boom Facing $11.6 Billion Loss

Bond investors who helped finance America’s shale boom are facing potential losses of $11.6 billion as oil prices plummet by the most since the credit crisis.

The $90 billion of debt issued by junk-rated energy producers in the past three years has fallen almost 13 percent since crude oil peaked in June. Halcon Resources Corp. (HK), SandRidge Energy Inc. and Goodrich Petroleum Corp. have been among the hardest hit as OPEC’s refusal to ease a supply glut pushed prices to a five-year low of $66.15 a barrel last week.

The oil selloff is deepening concern among bond investors that the least-creditworthy oil explorers will struggle to pay their obligations and prompt bankers to rein in credit lines as revenue slumps. Halcon, SandRidge and Goodrich are among about 21 borrowers operating in the costliest U.S. shale-producing regions that will be unprofitable if crude oil falls below $60 a barrel, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

“We are concerned that there will be defaults and that was even before oil fell as much as it has,” Ivan Rudolph-Shabinsky, a New York-based money manager at Alliance Bernstein Holding LP, said in a telephone interview. “There was too much money going into this space that would have resulted in problems long term -- now that timeline has been accelerated.”

Junk Bonds

The 12.9 percent loss for junk-rated energy debt issued by U.S. and Canadian companies since January 2012 compares with a 2.2 percent decline for the broader U.S. speculative-grade market since June, Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data show. Yields on junk-rated energy bonds averaged 8.54 percent yesterday, the most since July 2010 and up from 5.68 percent in June.

Halcon Resources’s $1.15 billion of 9.75 percent securities issued in April 2013 have lost 33 percent since June 30, while SandRidge’s $750 million of notes sold in October 2012 have plunged 29 percent, Bloomberg data show. Goodrich Petroleum’s $275 million of debt issued at the start of 2012 has dropped 37 percent.

Scott Zuehlke, a spokesman at Halcon, Daniel E. Jenkins, a spokesman at Goodrich, and Duane Grubert at SandRidge didn’t return calls seeking comment on exposure to oil prices.

Advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, have helped U.S. drillers pump the most in three decades. Companies have relied on debt financing to make up for cash shortfalls as they expanded, doubling energy bonds’ share of the high-yield market to 17 percent since 2008, according to a Oct. 14 report by Citigroup Inc.

Falling Oil

High-yield, high-risk debt is rated less than Baa3 by Moody’s Investors Service and under BBB- atStandard & Poor’s.

West Texas Intermediate crude dropped from a June high of $107.26, falling 17.9 percent in November after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries decided last week to keep its production target of 30 million barrels a day.

Output in the U.S. will climb to 9.5 million barrels a day next year, the most since 1970, the Energy Information Administration estimated Oct 7. Demand nationwide will slip this year to the lowest since 2012, the government predicted.

Lower oil prices will “affect cash flow but also capital spending, which in turn, affect projected production and cash flow in a downward spiral,” Gary Stromberg and Jan Trnka-Amrhein, analysts at Barclays Plc, wrote in a note to clients dated yesterday.

Borrowing Limits

Because the amount oil and gas companies are permitted to borrow from bank lenders is directly tied to the value of their reserves, falling commodity prices increase the risk they will face a cash squeeze, according to an Oct. 9 report by Spencer Cutter, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence in Skillman,New Jersey.

The extra yield investors demand to hold the bonds of energy companies instead of comparable U.S. Treasuries increased to 7.63 percentage points yesterday, more than double the premium in June, Bloomberg data show. The price of crude collapsed 35.7 percent during that period.

The issuance of debt has helped contribute to production growth in the U.S. and falling prices will make it harder for companies to meet their obligations, according to Virendra Chauhan, a London-based oil analyst with Energy Aspects Ltd.

“My sense is we’re just on the cusp of bad news there and we’ll see things get worse before they get better,” David Kurtz, global head of restructuring at Lazard Ltd., said at Beard Group Inc.’s Distressed Investing conference in New York yesterday.

To contact the reporters on this story: Nabila Ahmed in New York at nahmed54@bloomberg.net; Sridhar Natarajan in New York at snatarajan15@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Shannon D. Harrington atsharrington6@bloomberg.net Richard Bravo

When money was growing on trees even for junk-rated companies, and when Wall Street still performed miracles for a fee, thanks to the greatest credit bubble in US history, oil and gas drillers grabbed this money channeled to them from investors and refilled the ever deeper holes fracking was drilling into their balance sheets.

But the prices for crude oil, US natural gas, and natural gas liquids have all plunged. Revenues from unhedged production are down 40% or 50%, or more from just seven months ago. And when the hedges expire, the problem will get worse. The industry has been through this before. It knows what to do.

Layoffs are cascading through the oil and gas sector. On Tuesday, the Dallas Fed projected that in Texas alone, 140,000 jobs could be eliminated. Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) said that it was axing an undisclosed number of people in Houston. Suncor Energy (NYSE:SU), Canada's largest oil producer, will dump 1,000 workers in its tar-sands projects. Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) is idling rigs and cutting jobs. Smaller companies are slashing projects and jobs at an even faster pace. And now Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB), the world's biggest oilfield-services company, will cut 9,000 jobs.

It had an earnings debacle. It announced that Q4 EPS grew by 11% year-over-year to $1.50, "excluding charges and credits." In reality, its net income plunged 81% to $302 million, after $1.8 billion in write-offs that included its production assets in Texas.

To prop up its shares, it announced that it would increase its dividend by 25%. And yes, it blew $1.1 billion in the quarter and $4.7 billion in the year, on share buybacks, a program that would continue, it said. Financial engineering works. On Thursday, its shares were down 35% since June. But on Friday, after the announcement, they jumped 6%.

All these companies had gone on hiring binges over the last few years. Those binges are now being unwound. "We want to live within our means," is how Suncor CFO Alister Cowan explained the phenomenon.

Because now, they have to.

Larger drillers outspent their cash flows from production by 112% and smaller to midsize drillers by a breathtaking 157%, Barclays estimated. But no problem. Wall Street was eager to supply the remaining juice, and the piles of debt on these companies' balance sheets ballooned. Oil-field services companies, suppliers, steel companies, accommodation providers… they all benefited.

Now the music has stopped. Suddenly, many of these companies are essentially locked out of the capital markets. They have to live within their means or go under.

California Resources (NYSE:CRC), for example. This oil-and-gas production company operating exclusively in oil-state California, was spun off from Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:OXY) November 2014 to inflate OXY's share price. As part of the financial engineering that went into the spinoff, California Resources was loaded up with debt to pay OXY $6 billion. Shares started trading on December 1. Bank of America explained at the time that the company was undervalued and rated it a buy with a $14-a-share outlook. Those hapless souls who believed the Wall Street hype and bought these misbegotten shares have watched them drop to $4.33 by today, losing 57% of their investment in seven weeks.

Its junk bonds - 6% notes due 2024 - were trading at 79 cents on the dollar today, down another 3 points from last week, according to S&P Capital IQ LCD.

Others weren't so lucky.

Samson Resources is barely hanging on. It was acquired for $7.2 billion in 2011 by a group of private-equity firms led by KKR (NYSE:KKR). They loaded it up with $3.6 billion in new debt and saddled it with "management fees." Since its acquisition, it lost over $3 billion, the Wall Street Journal reported. This is the inevitable result of fracking for natural gas whose price has been below the cost of production for years - though the industry has vigorously denied this at every twist and turn to attract the new money it needed to fill the holes fracking for gas was leaving behind.

Having burned through most of its available credit, Samson is getting rid of workers and selling off a big part of its oil-and-gas fields. According to S&P Capital IQ LCD, its junk bonds - 9.75% notes due 2020 - traded at 26.5 cents on the dollar today, down about 10 points this week alone.

Halcón Resources (NYSE:HK), which cut its 2015 budget by 55% to 60% just to survive somehow, saw its shares plunge 10% today to $1.20, down 85% since June, and down 25% since January 12 when I wrote about it last. Its junk bonds slid six points this week to 72 cents on the dollar.

Hercules Offshore (NASDAQ:HERO), when I last wrote about it on October 15, was trading for $1.47 a share, down 81% since July. This rock-bottom price might have induced some folks to jump in and follow the Wall-Street hype-advice to "buy the most hated stocks." Today, it's trading for $0.82 a share, down another 44%. In mid-October, its 8.75% notes due 2022 traded at 66 cent on the dollar. Yesterday they traded at 45.

Despite what Wall-Street hype mongers want us to believe: bottom-fishing in the early stages of an oil bust can be one of the most expensive things to do.

Paragon Offshore (NYSE:PGN) is another perfect example of Wall Street engineering in the oil and gas sector. The offshore driller was spun off from Noble (NYSE:NE) in early August 2014 with the goal of goosing Noble's stock price. They loaded up the new company with debt. As part of the spinoff, it sold $580 million in junk bonds at 100 cents on the dollar. When its shares started trading, they immediately plunged. By the time I wrote about the company on October 15, they'd dropped 68% to $5.60. And the 6.75% notes due 2022 were trading at 77 cents on the dollar. Then in November, Paragon had the temerity to take on more debt to acquire Prospector Drilling Offshore.

Two days ago, Moody's downgraded the outfit to Ba3, with negative outlook, citing the "rapid and significant deterioration in offshore rig-market fundamentals," "the high likelihood" its older rigs might "not find new contracts," and the "mostly debt-funded acquisition" of Prospector Drilling. The downgrade affects about $1.64 billion in debt.

Today, Paragon's shares trade for $2.18, down another 61% since October 15. Its junk bonds are down to 58 cents on the dollar.

Swift Energy (NYSE:SFY) - whose stock, now at $2.37, has been declining for years and is down 84% from a year ago - saw its junk bonds shrivel another eight points over the week to 36 cents on the dollar.

"Such movement demonstrates the challenging market conditions for oil-spill credits, with spotty trades and often large price gaps lower," S&P Capital IQ LCD reported.

It boils down to this: these companies are locked out of the capital markets for all practical purposes; at these share prices, they can't raise equity capital without wiping out existing stockholders; and they can't issue new debt at affordable rates. For them, the junk-bond music has stopped. And their banks are getting nervous too.

Their hope rests on cutting operating costs and capital expenditures, and coddling every dollar they get, while pushing production to maximize cash flow, which ironically will contribute to the oil glut and pressure prices further. They're hoping to hang on until the next miracle arrives.

"We are not panicking," is how a bank CEO responded to the fact that loans to energy companies made up 20% of the bank's loan portfolio. (Read… How Wall Street Drove the Oil & Gas Drilling Boom That's Turnin...)

Editor's Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

It's almost as if some of us saw this bloodbath coming and were told that we were dumb for not trusting the inherent brilliance of the shale financiers...

Things to consider if you haven't already.

As you know stocks come in Preferred and Common stocks. When Mirant declared bankruptcy to shed debt, the 401K holders and the public were left holding the bag with stock worth 3% of the value when they tanked while the Big Money Boys got 125% of the stock value since they were holding preferred stocks, and the court ruled in their favor $$$.

The Rich trade using Hyper computers, and my bet is a few O&G ceos and their buddies will invest huge sums they have squirreled away from not paying fair royalties then when you follow their lead they will sell, taking your money while you watch an instantaneous plummet of the stocks with no way to sell fast enough to avoid a huge loss.

The result is that you helped keep the Big Boys from taking the loss they deserve to take for hording other peoples royalty money.

I don't pretend to be a Wall Street genius, just going from my past experience in corporate greed and unfair trading on Wall Street.



Wall Street spent years hyping, propagating, and funding the oil and gas drilling boom in the US. It handled the bonds and loans issued by often junk-rated companies. It instigated the waves of mergers & acquisitions, profiting every step along the way – advisory fees, bridge loans, syndication of loans, underwriting of bonds, etc. At the very tippy-top of the market, it pushed in the opposite direction and instigated spinoffs, creating independent publicly-traded companies that didn’t have a chance and cost unsuspecting investors in their shares and junk bonds a barrel of money. It orchestrated a series of similarly misbegotten energy IPOs.

Wall Street made money off the entire spectrum of companies associated directly or indirectly with oil and gas. It was one heck of a party.

The money had to keep flowing. Fracking is a capital intensive treadmill for companies that spend a lot more on drilling and completing wells than they get in cash from their production. Barclays estimated that larger drillers outspent their cash flows by 112% and smaller to midsize companies by a breathtaking 157%. The hole had to be filled with new money, or else the music would stop.

Wall Street hyped these junk bonds, leveraged loans, or new shares and pushed them into the hands of investors that had been bamboozled by the Fed into thinking that it had removed all risks from the equation. Investors closed their eyes and bought these nearly risk-free securities that are now decomposing before their very eyes.

But it didn’t matter to Wall Street because investment banking revenues were soaring, and because private equity firms where attracting a tsunami of money for their energy funds, and they all extracted their fees, and everyone got big bonuses, and to heck with the rest.

The money came from all directions, from TBTF banks, from local and regional banks, from PE firms, overseas investors, pension funds, hedge funds, mutual funds, and individual investors.

But here are the top 10 banks, according to DealBook, that in 2014 extracted the most investment-banking revenues from the oil and gas sector, or rather from its investors. Bailed-out and still troubled Citi was the king of the hill, obtaining $492 million in IB revenues from the oil and gas sector, representing 11.8% of its total IB revenues. Together, the ten skimmed off $3.52 billion last year.

US-Investment-Banks-oil-gas-revenues-2014

And these $3.52 billion in investment-banking revenues were extracted all year even as West Texas Intermediate had been doing this since June:

US-WTI-06-2014-01-12-2015

WTI plunged 58% since June to $45.26 per barrel as I’m writing this. The bloodletting simply doesn’t want to stop.

Then the other shoe dropped. Natural gas had been in recovery mode, after having gotten demolished for years, as production keeps soaring despite a price that’s below the cost of production at most wells. By mid-November, going into the winter, it was trading at $4.65 per million Btu when this happened:

US-NatGas_06-2014_01-12-2015

The price of natural gas plunged 40% in seven weeks to $2.82 per million Btu.

Despite the crashing energy stocks, mauled junk bonds, and beaten-down leveraged loans – all of which began to crimp Wall Street’s style – these 10 investment banks were still able to yank $3.5 billion from the sector and its bleeding investors. That’s true art.

The US is the world’s largest producer of hydrocarbon fuels – oil, natural gas, and associated liquids such as natural gasoline, condensate, and propane. So the broad price collapse will inflict more losses in the US than in any other country. But the US has a vast and diversified economy, so the losses won’t be felt like they’re being felt in Venezuela or Russia.

But they will be felt. The oil bust in the 1980s devastated the oil patch economy. It took down numerous local and regional banks as the losses were cascading through the system. The FDIC was busy auctioning off homes and office buildings. Businesses shut down. People left to find jobs somewhere else. This time around, Wall Street got involved in the boom up to its ears. And Wall Street is going to struggle with the aftermath.

Nearly 15% of Well Fargo’s IB revenues were from the oil and gas sector; Canadian Scotiabank got nearly 35% of its IB revenues from the sector. A good part of these revenues are drying up as new funding activities are hitting reality. There will be defaults. And banks will lose their shirts on deals that soured before they could shuffle them off as planned to unsuspecting Fed-blinded investors.

Despite Fed assurances that it had abolished all risks and that investors should no longer be rewarded with yield for taking risks it had abolished, investors find themselves suddenly confronted with terrible risks – for example, loans they considered nearly risk free because they were collateralized by oil. And losses are mounting.

Energy loans account for 2% of Wells Fargo’s loan portfolio; so any losses are unlikely to sink the bank though they could do some serious damage given the magnitude of Wells Fargo’s loan portfolio. Local and regional banks in the oil patch are more at risk. DealBook cites MidSouth Bank, in Lafayette, Louisiana. Of the loans on its books, 20% are to oil and gas companies. This is what happened to banks in Texas and Oklahoma during the last oil bust. But CEO Rusty Cloutier said what all CEOs in this situation have to say: “We are not panicking.”

Last time this happened in the oil patch, the stock market crashed. “Going to be a painful period of time,” is how Texas Gov. Rick Perry explained the situation. Read…  This Is Just the Beginning of the Great American Oil Bust 


RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service