Hillary on Oil and Gas

I recently watched the movie "Hillary's America" I recommend every American see that. It explains the history of the democratic party and the rise of the Clintons. It talks about their views on the oil and gas industry and the war on coal and fossil fuels. I came away from that movie enlightened and disturbed. If she becomes our next POTUS we are in for trouble on a biblical scale. Our country will cease to exist as we know it. Has any one else on site seen this? 

Views: 11471

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Barry D on September 10, 2016 at 2:52am

Welcome to mud wrasslin' GMS style.

Permalink Reply by Barry D on September 10, 2016 at 3:01am

lance,

Yes there was the 1.7 billion dollar ransom paid for our citizens held hostage.

Don't forget the 150 billion dollars paid t Iran for signing the lousy nuclear deal.

Now comes word that during the negotiations for that deal (2014-2015) the Obama administration paid Iran 33 billion (700 million a month) to keep the talks alive.

So that's over 180 billion paid to an enemy of our country by the Obama administration.

Plus, don't forget the secret side deals Obama and Kerry made with Iran which allow exemptions from certain terms of the nuclear deal.

Hillary is on board with all of this. Help our enemies and hurt our citizens.

Don't forget, as President she intends to eliminate hydraulic fracturing which will essentially shut down domestic oil and gas development.

Why? Because she is corrupt and has taken millions from the Saudis.

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on September 10, 2016 at 3:51am

Reading it, seeing it, hearing it and believing it.

All things that I would call 'deplorable'. 

To me - as it stands right now, voting the Republican ticket would be worth the risk; as I think it's high time time for a political sea change.

JMHO

Permalink Reply by Barry D on September 10, 2016 at 3:52am

Joseph,

We need a change in DC back to government FOR THE PEOPLE.

I think Trump will propose policies that will benefit the people and country as a whole.

We already know what a Hillary administration would bring; more crony capitalism and only policies that would help her friends and her wallet. Just look where she stands on domestic oil and gas development.

She is a against domestic oil and gas development Trump supports that development. She is against it because that will be good for the entities that put money in her wallet (via bribes in the form of donations to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation)

The choice is simple.

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on September 10, 2016 at 4:01am

To me 'for the people' includes honoring and upholding rights of private ownership especially above corporate welfare at the expense of individuals.

That's what complicates it for me (based on what I'm reading, seeing, hearing these days and especially elsewhere / on other posts on these very pages).

Permalink Reply by Barry D on September 10, 2016 at 4:11am

Joseph,

In general I believe that Trump believes in the Constitution,whic is based in part on the belief in private property rights.

Hillary does not believe in the Constitution and as a Marxist/Socialist she is absolutely opposed to private property rights.

The choice here is simple.

To be more specific though, I believe that the issues of property rights that we see discussed in this forum are more properly addressed at the state level. For example, I seriously doubt that the issue of royalty payments will rise to a national discussion and involve the President.

On the other hand, the issue of whether you own your oil and gas rights or the government owns them is what is at stake here.

Hillary Clinton, like all Marxist/Socialists, believes that the government ultimately owns all property.

Again, the choice is simple, a Marxist/Socialist or someone who believes in the Constitution.

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on September 10, 2016 at 4:55am

Seeing it.

Then we need to educate and correct State Government to represent the people as opposed to corporations.

Let's beat them into submission with the Constitution.

Isn't that part and parcel of what the Attorney General's Office is supposed to do ?

Why isn't that happening I wonder ?

Why aren't we reading about that correction occurring I wonder ?

Permalink Reply by Barry D on September 10, 2016 at 5:06am

Joseph,

You are singing my song.

I have preached for some time now that landowners need to be engaged with their state representatives. And, I mean engaged daily if not just monthly.

That is the only way they will listen, especially at election time. Which happens to be now. Most of our state reps and Senators are up for election this November. We should all be contacting anyone seeking office and finding out their position on landowner rights, minimum royalties etc.

Permalink Reply by lance on September 11, 2016 at 12:56am

Nothing is happening because the "Powers that be" are stifling every effort to up hold the constitution. Obama is a Constitution expert and also knows ways to go around it. The same way he goes around Congress with is "pen and phone" to impose "executive orders". The Attorney General's office is under the control of Obama and will do whatever he tells them to do for fear of retribution. The same thing happened with Comey, the F.B.I. director. Anyone one else but Hillary would have been indicted because in this case shit rolls up hill all the way to the oval office. Now, there have been 4 people "killed" in the last few months with connections to the D.N.C. and anti-Clinton people. Google these  people, Dem staffer, Seth Conrad Rich, UN official John Ashe, Author, Victor Thorn,  and Shawn Lucas, lead attorney in the anti-Clinton DNC fraud case. And there have also been more people die suspiciously in the past with ties to the Clintons. These people play "hard ball". Hope this answers your questions.  

Permalink Reply by Jerry on September 10, 2016 at 7:15am
Sometimes in life, we are put in a position where the only thing we can do is choose the lesser of two evils. In this case, Trump is definitely the lesser of two evils because Hillary is the Anti-Christ. And to those who say they are not going to vote because they dont like either candidate, well, if you dont vote at all, you are automatically voting for Hillary, and that is what she is counting on, so think about that when you choose to do nothing about what will happen to you if she wins.
Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on September 10, 2016 at 7:24am

If you ask me it would be more accurate to say that most (if not all) of the time in life you find yourself to be in the position of selecting the lesser of (at least) two evils (especially politically / when voting).

Permalink Reply by Barry D on September 10, 2016 at 8:49am

Jerry,

I would also add that a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Hillary.

And before you Johnson fans start with your rhetoric that he draws equally from Trump and Hillary, the facts show that not to be true.

When Johnson supporters were asked to choose from Trump and Hillary they chose Trump 41% - 29%. So Johnson hurts Trump more than Hillary.

I re-state, a vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary.

Plus, Johnson is in favor of a "Carbon Tax" which has the potential to hurt domestic oil and gas development.

If you support shale development the choice is simple, Trump.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service