Baseline Water Testing for Northeastern PA - a different Tiered Approach for Private Well Owners

This is a list of parameter for wells outside the 1000 foot radius around a well and not along a horizontal leg. I do not agree with the standard 3-Tiered approach and I am providing this as an alternative.

Testing Package # 1
This package is recommended as a screening for post gas development or screening for wells that are not a long a major roadway or areas that have not been leased.
Parameters
Total Coliform with e. coli confirmation, chloride, sodium, bromide, barium, pH, total dissolved solids, MBAS, iron, manganese, and methane/ethane.

Testing Package # 2
This is the minimum package I recommend for the area- this is based on PADEP recommendations, plus I added Arsenic and nitrate.
Parameters
Package # 1- plus T. Hardness, Magnesium, Selenium, Strontium, Conductivity, Calcium, Zinc, Alkalinity, Arsenic, Nitrate, Total Suspended Solids, Sulfate, Oil & Grease, and 21-VOCs/MTBE.
Testing Package # 3
More Comprehensive- Assuming the wells are outside 1000 feet of a well site and not along a horizontal leg
Package # 2 - plus Potassium, Sulfide, Ammonia, Acidity, Nickel, Gross, Alpha/Beta, Lead, and Uranium.


Possible Addons- Based on available frac water data- this would be more appropriate for wells within 1000 feet or less.
Radium 226 and Radium 228
Turbidity- cheap screening test
Phenol and phenolic compounds- located near well or along major road
Chemical Oxygen Demand - still considering
Total Organic Carbon- still considering
2- Butanone (methyl ethyl ketone)
Naphthalene
Phthalates- this may be a problem already for private wells with PVC casing or substand piping.
Ethylene Glycol
1,2- Propanediol - I think this is being used by some as an alternative to ethylene glycol
Methylchloride
Acetone - possible source - breakdown in 1,2- Propanediol and other compounds with acetone rings
Acetophenone
Lithium- reviewing
Aluminum- reviewing
Thallium reviewing
2-Methylnaphthalene
SOCs

Website provided for information only and the site is always under development and subject to change.

Other Post on the subject
http://pennsylvania-solutions.blogspot.com/2010/07/getting-waters-tested-informational-and.html

Co-Authored - New Publication on Water Quality for Private Well Owners- Website - http://www.wilkes.edu/water

Views: 268

Comment

You need to be a member of GoMarcellusShale.com to add comments!

Join GoMarcellusShale.com

Comment by Brian Oram, PG on September 11, 2010 at 11:37am
Comment to Mike - I work at Wilkes University and I would be happy to come to a program to help citizens understand the testing results.
Comment by Brian Oram, PG on August 21, 2010 at 10:18am
Kyle - I would agree- The listing of recommended parameters are for citizens outside of the 1000 foot zone. If you are within a 1000 feet, I would probably add a few more parameters. Going 1-mile may be warranted if you are along a major roadway, along a horizontal leg, or near a secondary activity.

Thanks

Brian
Comment by Larry on August 20, 2010 at 6:37pm
Brian,
Thanks for the info and the links. I belive every landowner who has there own water needs this info. I know I sure do.
Larry
Comment by Kyle Gallagher on August 19, 2010 at 10:09am
rfs, you are certainly correct. A property owner needs to have a baseline to compare to in the future (and yes that can protect the gas/energy company), if/when a property is altered within the subsurface or a change occurs within the groundwater supplying the property. Please keep in mind the radius needed to comply with regulations is not an exact science at 1,000 feet. If my well were within a mile of active drilling I would be testing it.
Comment by Robin Fehrenbach Scala on August 19, 2010 at 8:24am
The way I see it, the most important part in this equation is to HAVE THE WATER TESTED BEFORE any drilling takes place. Regardless of whether the average person can understand the test initially, unless you have that pre-drilling test you have nothing.
Most of the leases signed in the last year or two now require water testing for properties within a certain radius of a well site, and these tests are to be paid for by the gas company. This is as much for their protection as for ours. After all, no company wants to be blamed for problem water if that condition existed prior to the work.
Thanks for the information, Brian. Many people are concerned with this issue and should make use of this.
Comment by Brian Oram, PG on August 18, 2010 at 11:33pm
Understanding the results - go to http://www.wilkes.edu/water
Free Publication - Also - the interpretation of the results should come from a good consultant. If not I conduct training and outreach to help citizens understand and interpret results.

Regarding the other post about hiring a lab for baseline - some of our local labs have very good and quality technicians that can meet many general needs. This is really laboratory dependent. In addition many labs have licensed water treatment and wastewater treatment plant operators. They may not have the background of a geologist - but they should stand up to cross examination and properly collect the sample.

Also note - If the local data is showing nitrate-N at 1 mg NO3-N/L - it would be advisable to add Nitrite - mg NO2-N/L to the baseline assessment.
Comment by Kyle Gallagher on August 18, 2010 at 2:25pm
You should hire a private consultant that will walk you through the process in the beginning and provide you the information you need to protect your property (groundwater and well). This will also provide you a good baseline of analytical results moving forward.

Please do not hire an independant laboratory to complete testing on your well.
Comment by Mike Kaschak on August 18, 2010 at 12:58am
Sounds good, but all the testing in the world will not help if one cannot understand
the results. What we need is a class to present how results are interpreted, or several
spread out across areas or counties.

Mike

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service