Is it lawful for a company to pool your property if you are not under lease in Ohio?
Do they not have to approach you for a lease if you are within a certain geographic location from a well?
Tags:
There is a mandatory pooling statute in Ohio.
A given company can only force pool five times in one year.
There is a rigid process that must be followed.
You can go to the ODNR website and read about mandatory pooling.
I think a good tactic is to always keep negotiating, never close the door. A landowner may eventually get most of the terms desired, but if you close that door, mandatory pooling is an option for an oil company.
Hello if I read the mandatory pooling law correctly I will try to base this explanation on a normal leasing deal we have been familiar with . Lets use a royalty of 20% landowner 80% for drilling company like many leases
.The way it is now each landowner that accepts upfront bonus payment money will be entitled to his share of the landowners 20% royalty based on the amount of acres he owns in the unit .
Basically a landowner under lease with 100 acres in a 1000 acre unit will receive 1/10 of the 20% share of the landowners royalty . if monthly 20% royalty payment to the landowners is a total of $200,000 the landower with the 100 acre lease gets his share in the amount of $20,000 and the company would get $800,000
Now if a person refuses to sign a lease the company can apply to have the property force pooled . just for example if the unit is 1000 acres and the pooled acres is equal to 100 acres from a non leasing landowner
. According to what I read if the well cost is 10 million to drill and be ready for production the unleased landowner would be responsible for 1/10 of the cost .
If the unleased landowner cannot afford to pay his 1 million cost then the drilling company can pay this cost and basically carry the unleased landowners normal costs .
For doing this the drilling company can charge the unleased landowner a total of 2 million which is equal to 200% of the normal landowners cost since the drilling company footed the bill for the unleased landowner .
When the production starts once the unleased landowers 10% produces a profit of 2 Million (200% recovery) the driller is considered as repaid for the money they invested for the unleased landowner
At this point the unleased landowner is then entitled to continue to receive a 10% share of the driillers future profits from this point forward of the 80% royalty rights which would be about 4 times more profit than the unleased landowner would have made if he had leased and taken the bonus money in the first place .
As long as the well comes in good this would be better for any landowner if I understand the pooling laws correctly . I hope im right with the pooling law and this helps , pooling is not as bad as it sounds in all cases
best wishes to everyone
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com