They are working for Eclipse.. and if you read anything about the Eclipse/ End Cap deal.. you will know this is a total flip program.. of course. if you don't care.. no big deal.. but if you are approached and wish more info . feel free to contact me.. mick
Tags:
This is the only time I personally have seen it described this way. Can't speak for others. I've included in my other replies just 2 of the links that describe it the other way.
In the Marcellus/Utica region, the Vertical Pugh clause idea is pretty recent (as in the past couple of years) since the average Joe (myself included) didn't realize at first that there were other layers that also had value. When we began to learn that there was more beneath us than we thought, some were able to include both of these Pugh clauses in their leases in our area.
I used to think that as well. But, it is actually the opposite. I learned it the hard way, as I was in a meeting with a client and was corrected by our head O&G attorney on the proper use. Thus, now I use Strategraphic and Geographic in describing the situations .So now there is none of this none-sense.
I agree about more technical descriptions possibly making the Pugh Clause more clear for lessors but I, myself, need more evidence to be convinced to change my idea of the vertical and horizontal pugh clause meanings.
http://www.mineralweb.com/owners-guide/lease-proposals/pugh-clause/Right, Horizontal is sideways, Vertical is depth (or up and down).
We have both in our lease.
Jett, you're right. Horizontal is for acres not included in the unit to be released from the lease at the expiration of the primary term and vertical is to release all the formations of shale not in production by the expiration of the primary term.
Both vertical and horizontal pugh clause is the way to go and a definite advantage to the rights owners.
In researching this, there are many variations of terms used to cover depth and surface.
It seems like some of the confusion has resulted from a court case in Texas in how the term "horizontal" was interpreted in favor of the Lessee as opposed to the losing Lessor. Apparently the Lessors thought their acreage was protected, as was their intent in including a Horizontal Pugh clause in their lease, until it was ruled otherwise.
Using the term "vertical" to describe the release of a horizontal surface seems to fly in the face of common sense so of course there is mass confusion over these terms.
There really should be a standard, unequivocal term for each meaning. It should be clear to the Landowners, the courts and the Gas/Oil cos what is the meaning in the leases. These are vital clauses that seriously affect the landowners' protection of their properties.
Of course, you can just try your best.
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Let-s-have-fun-lease-4230861.S.89526506
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com