Force pool Odot? Can they do that? I hope so....

Just wondering if what I hear could happen. Anyone know about I-70 acreage being force-pooled?

Views: 1164

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by KAR on March 24, 2015 at 2:45pm
Yes, since O-Dot is not allowed to sign leases currently it can, and has been, forced pooled into units through unitization.
Permalink Reply by Joe Bezel on March 24, 2015 at 4:44pm

Wow.  I wonder if they stick the state of Ohio with a lousy 12.5 percent?

Permalink Reply by lance on March 25, 2015 at 1:52am

I've noticed all the laterals from the wells drilled are stopping about 500 feet from the interstates.  So far I have not seen one lateral going under the interstates. But they can go under State Routes. Seems the Governor could use the money to fix the roads and other infrastructure...    

Permalink Reply by evan on March 25, 2015 at 3:41am
I think a big issue with interstates in going to be the landowners who used to own where the interstate now lays. Most of these landowners lost this property to eminant domain so it was taken from them. Some agrees to sell , others didn't. A lot of people will fight this I'm sure. Some will think their family should have got to retain mineral rights. Their opening up huge can of worms.
Permalink Reply by Philip Brutz on March 25, 2015 at 4:44am
Permalink Reply by Gary Keeney on March 25, 2015 at 5:18am

Does  anyone know if that would apply to Army Corp. of Engineers land?

Permalink Reply by evan on March 25, 2015 at 7:43am
That's right Philip I forgot about that one. There was supposed to be a hearing on this one but it was cancelled because Eclipse pulled out of the area. So for now these laterals will be decided later.
Permalink Reply by Jan on March 27, 2015 at 9:31am

Ohio HB 8, which deals with Unitization, just passed the full House last week by a unanimous vote and now heads to the Senate.

This bill allows unitization of land owned by the State, with exceptions for State Parks and Forests.

I am watching it closely and will again offer testimony in the Senate.  BTW, Sen. Troy Balderson, Zanesviile, is the Chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

Anyone who owns land in the Fineran Unit may want to testify, too.

Permalink Reply by lance on March 28, 2015 at 1:28am

WOW! Thanks for the info... I thought my property would be limited to drilling because it borders I-70 just outside Old Washington but now it may be more desirable because of that. There are 2 units less than a mile away on the other side of I-70 A.E.U. is gonna drill soon. They could catch my 22 acres in one or both maybe.....? Thanks   

Permalink Reply by Kathi Albertson on March 30, 2015 at 7:20am
Does HB 8 apply only to state owned land.
Permalink Reply by Philip Brutz on March 30, 2015 at 7:25am
Permalink Reply by Frank Walker on March 30, 2015 at 7:41am

Certainly any landowner who had land taken by eminent domain, to enable building of an interstate highway, should not also simultaneously have been required to surrender rights a mile or two deep.  Just the thought of this is outrageous!!!

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service