I came across the attached article. It basically talks about whether the producer would be less inclined to sell to a distant company at a higher price with a no deduction lease and why. I would like anyone's input on this. I never thought about it this way.

Views: 890

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Interesting article. We don't usually read about that viewpoint.

Just more horse puckey propaganda supporting sticking more expense to the landowner / lessor and trying to talk the landowner / lessor into believing they should be smiling while getting stuck.

This could work for somebody who has an enormous net mineral interest, who is sophisticated and experienced with oil and gas marketing, or who just has a lot of money to throw at people who have the right training and experience to check up on things.  Almost none of my clients fit that description.  For them, a no deductions clause is the right way to go because it's the only way they can check up on the producer.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service