Today's Top BS ??

Maybe instead of "Today's Top Content", the GMS membership would be better served by a link titled 'Today's Top BS"  :))))))  Perhaps having the distinction of numerous appearances on this Link of Infamy would help to keep some people on their leash :)

Views: 1712

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by bo boboski on December 15, 2013 at 4:40am

This site is like a garden;  you have to pull the weeds and keep what you can use, almost daily!

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on December 15, 2013 at 10:06am

These days - anywhere and in anything - you have to look very hard to find value.

Wish it weren't so.

But it is.

Sign of the times ? ?

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on December 15, 2013 at 10:50am
Nothing specific - just in general.
Permalink Reply by thelma cathleen hays on December 15, 2013 at 10:34am
I have tried to help people and I have been doing this for 3 years dealing with Chk because I have a pad with producing wells. You had made a comment after I posted my dealing with division order. So from now on I will just help people I know. And just laugh at all the b.s. You all are falling for!!!
Permalink Reply by evan on December 15, 2013 at 10:47am
I appreciate it Thelma because I to am in a Chesapeake unit. Their drilling first one now. I'm scared of all I've heard about them
Permalink Reply by Trapper on December 15, 2013 at 1:43pm

Thelma, I think you misunderstood Charles' reply about BS. He was contrasting your true life experience with Marcus Grayson's earlier reply which was:

"If you don't sign it they won't pay you.  Period.  CHK's division order department is a total dumpster fire.  Are they claiming deductions that are unauthorized by your lease?"

I took Charles to mean that Marcus was the BS'er , not you. You are saying you haven't signed any division orders and have suffered no consequences , whereas Marcus claims it is necessary to sign them or you won't be paid.......

0i7okn54zwbdoPermalink Reply by 0i7okn54zwbdo on December 15, 2013 at 5:51pm

Sorry, I call it like it is.  CHK's division order people have zero interest in keeping landowners informed and they have taken a hard line on the signing of division orders in a number of units.  If the OP wants people to trust CHK blindly then that is his own problem.  I for one see all the damage they can do and don't trust them in the least.

Permalink Reply by Anonymous on December 16, 2013 at 3:44am

Maybe Marcus and Thelma are both right?   So much depends on previous leases, the current lease, whether you have a well pad or not.   weather you have a good well or not, weather you have………...

Permalink Reply by Nancy LeNau on December 15, 2013 at 4:15pm

Please Thelma, Continue posting ?  I am with Chk. All information is appreciated !   Thank you, Nancy

Permalink Reply by thelma cathleen hays on December 16, 2013 at 12:47am

It is only a law in Texas that they have to sign a division orders. Evan I sure hope they didn't talk you into signing surface use agreement for your pad. All you have to do is allow them space for a pad and a access road. I would like to know who is telling you people that you have to sign a division order.

Permalink Reply by Anonymous on December 16, 2013 at 3:41am

Is the law on Division orders in Ohio  the same as W.V.?   I know you didn't have to sign them, but do you have to in Ohio?   I have no intention of signing anything that voids our lease.   It is a good lease and I plan to keep it valid.    We shall see as the months progress how easy or hard it is……..

0i7okn54zwbdoPermalink Reply by 0i7okn54zwbdo on December 16, 2013 at 3:56am

This is from CHK's website regarding DOs in Texas: 

"A Division Order is the document necessary to begin payment of natural gas royalties. This legally required document verifies a mineral owner’s interest in a producing well and authorizes the operator to pay the owner based on that interest."

For Ohio it says this: 

"Division orders are documents that verify a mineral owner's interest in a producing well and authorize the operator to pay the owner their interest. "

This leads me to believe that there is no law stating that you must sign it, however within every lease there is a provision that says that landowners will sign any documents that the operator deems necessary for production, which can include title corrections, landowner name changes, etc.  I imagine that CHK considers a DO to be one of those documents.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service