Tags:
What happen to the days of 30% deductions being a lot lol.
Dave,
The royalty deduction issue all comes down to how later judges/courts interpret the PA Supreme Court ruling on Kilmer v. Elexco in 2010. Here is very good overview of the issues:
http://www.duqlawblogs.org/blj/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/hantz.pdf
Here is an article that states that the PA Supreme Court decision essentially changed the definition of royalty to include deductions:
I agree that the wording in the circa 2007 Phillips leases explicitly states that the royalty be paid on the proceeds to the lessee (O&G company) and that deductions are explicitly limited to taxes. Sounds like a slam dunk to get no deductions but Kilmer has thrown a wrench into the reasoning process.
The Kilmer case was not about deductions per se as the Kilmer lease contained provision for the deductions associated with wet gas from horizontal wells. The lawyers in the Kilmer case argued that the deductions could not go below 12.5%. The Judges could have simply ruled that the lease stands as written but instead went into great detail to justify the “net back” reasoning.
This was a VERY industry favorable ruling. If the legal definition of the word “royalty” has been established in PA (by the PA Supreme Court no less), it would be hard to argue against deductions being applied to the holders of the old Phillips leases.
Phil
Dave,
I talked to Jim last night as he left his dinner at Hardwood and met Patricia. Nice people. He farms my farm on Brownsdale. You must know about his model railroading hobby. We own several of the "Marburger" dairy railroad cars.
Thank you for your kind words. I'm really just sharing my experience.
XTO had the chance to charge us negative numbers early on but they didn't. I'm don't think that you will be sending them a check. On the other hand, who knows how they calculate the expences.
Best regards,
Phil
Phil,
It seems like the drillers want to treat the "Royalty Interest" owners more like "Working Interest" owners, which is so very wrong. Especially, for "Gross Royalty Interest" owners.
Yes. But I don't know why.
Phil
I did see the article.
My random thoughts:
I believe the pre 2007 lease language does not permit XTO from deducting costs beyond taxes. The PA supreme court, as Phil pointed out, changed that definition.
I also enjoy Phil's posts, along with the other Butler County regulars. I value they're input.
If the NG prices do not increase, and the cost's of transmission for the product do not decrease, and the increase in pressure from the landowners to obtain a "fair" deduction percentage. (My 2007 lease has NO deduction clause)
What will stop the GOC's from stopping most production and additional drilling until the market bears a greater result?
How much did you spend on attorney's fees to get an 14% royalty?
Is a 14% royalty after attorneys fees, a better deal in a 650 acre producing unit, or is 12.5% in a 300 acre producing unit better?
I have been involved in and had a settlement from a class action lawsuit against Citizens Bank. I recieved ten cents on the dollar.
If the gas companies turn the valve off to wait out the market, 100% of zero, is zero.
Just my thoughts. I'm am disheartened by the current situation and I do feel taken advantage of.
Please direct me to the Butler County lawyers who are developing Class Action lawsuit against XTO.
I have a Phillips Production Lease and in two years $20,000 has been deducted by XTO for gathering & transportation. What is the basis for these charges, seems quite arbitrary, is there a formula?
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com