Hillary Clinton would Kill Shale Drilling
“You know, I don’t support it when any locality or any state is against it, number one. I don’t support it when the release of methane or contamination of water is present. I don’t support it—number three—unless we can require that anybody who fracks has to tell us exactly what chemicals they are using.
“So by the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place. And I think that’s the best approach, because right now, there are places where fracking is going on that are not sufficiently regulated.”
Hillary Clinton
Views: 2500
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Frank Walker on
-
"I know that people who read this site intend to vote for her."
Site readers maybe. But any actual in-the-shale landowner who votes for Hillary is certifiably insane. And I mean that quite literally.
-
Permalink Reply by Barry D on
-
Frank,
I know people who are receiving royalties who intend to vote for HiLIARy.
-
Permalink Reply by alexandra on
-
Frank, I agree. She is in Forbes today saying she will make regulations on fracking so stringent that it will stop fracking in this country. I am voting for anyone who says drill baby drill!!
-
Permalink Reply by David Allen Lilly on
-
I am not ready to cede the election to Hillary. She is an awful candidate, democrat voter enthusiasm is way down and she is having trouble in her primary with a cranky old northeastern socialist.
I know it goes against popular opinion but I think she is inherently beatable and I think Trump can turn the election in a one on one debate with her.
-
Permalink Reply by john on
-
in my opinion Hillary will not kill exploration, she is a realist as her husband was and
sshe said she will be a friend to businesses if they are ecology prudent.
She does not want to see high unemployment.
. Bernie on the other hand will kill fossil fuels. he will turn this country into another Europen socialist regime.
I
-
Permalink Reply by Barry D on
-
john,
I take it that you are a HiLIARy supporter.
With all due respect, you are deluding yourself.
HiLIARy just finished telling coal workers that she has plans to shut down coal mining. But, that they shouldn't worry, she also has plans for the government to pay the displaced workers a subsidy and retraining.
She has the same plans for the oil and gas industry and it's workers.
She DOES WANT high unemployment. The theory is this - the more people receiving checks from the government, the more guaranteed votes for those politicians who support the government programs that pay out.
-
Permalink Reply by Rick Foshee on -
Well - I kinda agree with john in some ways... the government needs the MONEY. The government needs for the people to have energy that doesn't cost too much MONEY. If the self-supporting people knew just how much MONEY solar and wind energy actually take (including subsidies), they'd puke. Of course, the government pays out a lot of MONEY to provide a huge slice of the population with free recharging of the free phones, free cooking, free lights, free a/c, free toasty-warm heat, free TV, etc... Most of the panderers-to-the-people know we can't just keep borrowing MONEY forever. You know, now that I think about it, an old adage comes to mind. It goes something like - "It's all about the foldin' MONEY" (or something like that)...
-
-
SHE AND THE FEDS DO NOT REGULATE HF; IT IS BY THE STATES. MORE IMPORTANT WE
ELECT PRO DRILLING CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS AND JUDGES AT LOCAL LEVELS.
HILLARY HAS BEEN KNOWN TO TALK BOTH SIDES OF HER FACE.
-
-
I voted for the bully. I'm one of those angry voters according to the news sources.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
Top Content
Latest Activity
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
