My wife and I are part of a landowners group that is in the process of having their Range Resources contract reviewed by attorneys. We only have 3.2 acres and have not decided whether we are actually going to sign a lease. I am curious to hear from people who started to go through the process and then at some point decided against it. I'd like to hear your reasons. FYI - I'm not posting this so I can attack people's decisions. I am genuinely interested in hearing from people who decided not to sign a lease.
Thanks in advance!
Tags:
Range Resources will not entertain a contract that limits them to specific resources at specific depths. They want surface to core. I'm not a fan of this and most of what I read said that you should call out what they can and can't take, including any heavy hydrocarbons they are able to separate out from the raw gas.
Our quandry is more related to the safety of the whole process. I am fairly confident in the fracking process and the related engineering. However, I have issues with the fact that we don't really know what all this drilling / fracking is going to do to our environment. I am not a tree hugger, but I am practical and have tried to find information related to the safety of this whole process (pad creation, drilling, fracking, waste removal / disposal / storage). Washington County and even some areas of Butler County (Connequenessing Twp) have reported some serious environmental issues related to the waste ponds and harmful chemicals showing up in the water. That gives me enough pause to wonder if it's worth it at this stage.
Having said that - I'll revert to my previous response above and say that it's going to be in our area anyway so it's not like if I don't sign it's not coming.
Jonathan,
When talking about the safety of the process keep in mind the fact that just about everything in the process is continually being upgraded with new knowledge or technology. Take waste water holding ponds....they are not being used anymore by some or all of the drillers. They have taken that previous problem (flowback holding ponds) out of the equation by re-using the vast majority of the flowback. Also, right now Chesapeake is testing a new mix of non-hazardous compounds in actual wells for fracking that do away with the current mix of the so-called problem 'chemicals'.
I believe the changes have been happening faster recently because they are now drilling in a much more populated area then before which is constantly forcing their hand to find better solutions to their problems. We need to keep a watchful eye on them as well as our regulators and all will be fine.... Except when man and/or machine fail, which will occasionally happen regardless of how much effort is put forth to avoid it.
there have been plenty of man/machine failures in bradford county pa thus far.........spills of diesel fuel, fracking water, gas leaks, and so much in the way of emissions from the actual equipment inc all the trucks used for transport of water and equipment. roads have been destroyed. water has been contaminated.
Yes, changes are happening........................................but ONLY AFTER some of the above happen. there are MANY frackwater ponds in this county already................they do exist and are being used NOW. the failure of well casings HAS happened....and due to poor quality materials, which the companies don't find............the failures find, and the inspectors find.
so please don't talk about how wonderful this all is. it is NOT all wonderful. chesapeake is who told me that the 'fresh water' they wanted to run through my land was actually frack water with only four chemicals removed at the well site......after questioning from me, a definition of 'fresh water' far from what i would ever have given. do not be fooled by the words used; the process of gas retrieval is moving as fast as the companies can move; speed does not promote careful study. and out west, where this has been going on longer than here in the east? out there they haye HUGE problems of structure and pollution of many types.
one does not have to have been 'born' into not liking gas field development. this is real and now and IS NOT without many risks which will forever change this area of the planet. i do not believe this whole thing can be stopped; i do believe there are some things landowners can do to protect their own property/selves to some extent; the bottom line is that the gas industry is in charge, we are mere pawns, and whatever we do, sign or not, with care or not, the region is still going to be pocked with well sites and some type of frack water disposal, access roads, compressors and pig launchers/receivers, etc.. and the extra traffic and personnel will be with us for many years before the boom dies down. and then we can all feel the pain of loss of income here again.
the concerns are not about 'treehugging' but rather about breathing and drinking and growing things in the soil by PEOPLE who live here. any and all study and care that can be brought to the process to keep safety for all foremost is so needed....as well as 'improvements' in process.....but BEFORE it is used and not after much harm has already been done. 'care/safety' means 'people hugging' much more than 'tree hugging'.....though it is certainly desirable to keep the trees alive as well as the people. that seems more about caring about our country than merely blindly endorsing any and all means to extract fossil fuels.
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com