Tags:
Probably would be a good idea to have your attorney look it over. We had portions of our lease reassigned to other companies that partnered with the original company that we leased with. There were no problems and we did not have a clause saying that we had to be notified we found out when we started getting royalty payments from the other two companies.
RO,
When (what date) did you get the letter?
Were you signed directly with Chesapeake?
Do you have an ALOV-CHK lease (were you part of the ALOV group)?
Where is your leased acreage located (Township, County, State)?
Asking Permission isn't something Chesapeake usually does. Their typical MO is to just do what they want and then deal with the consequences later.
Try sending them a letter asking for a copy of the agreement between Eclipse and Chesapeake that would transfer ownership.
In the letter tell them "under advice from counsel" you would like to read a copy of the ENTIRE agreement between Eclipse and Chesapeake before you send them written consent.
By using the word "counsel" you come across as less aggressive/threatening in your request. If you say "Attorney" they will figure you have lawyered up and are getting ready for a fight. "Counsel" could be anyone, a financial planner, an accountant, your grandparents, uncle frank or aunt millie, or even your local psychic.
There is no harm in asking for a copy of their transfer agreement. The worst they could do is say "NO". After you get a copy of their agreement then decide if you want to consult an attorney.
While you wait for their reply keep checking this thread to see if anyone else is able to contribute any more information.
They will likely not show you the agreement between the two parties. They may be bound by a CA to not show anyone until the document is executed and recorded. So I agree that RO should ask but not be surprised if they say no.
like alan bowers, I too am shocked that Chesapeake requested the permission of the landowner to assign. Our lease has the"prior written consent from lessor required" but we were never informed by Range Resources or Chesapeake about the assignment. This was three years ago. We have written many certified letters about the subject to them which they ignore. We return the yearly leasing fees. They are going to hold on to our lease until we take them to court. That is their MO.
If you deny the assignment they will fight you on the unreasonably withheld issue or most likely by just doing it anyway and wait for you to sue them in court.
But then assignment to eclipse has got to be better then staying with Chesapeake!
That last sentence says it all. good luck! People wonder why some folks sell their minerals out right.
I'd get a good attorney on this. As it would be an assignment of the original lease were you happy with that lease? Might Eclipse agree for a addendum to the lease such as a clause that shuts the door on paying enhancement charges? You have something they want to modify why shouldn't you perhaps also want to modify?
Anne is correct. Eclipse is doing a lot (and planning to do a lot) in this area. I would be happy, if I were you, to deal with Eclipse rather than CHK.
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com