john goodday
  • Male
  • Gas Professional
Share Twitter
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (14)
  • Events
  • Local Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Marcellus Videos

John goodday's Friends

  • Keith Mauck (Site Publisher)

john goodday's Discussions

Unit Consolidation Orders-OH
2 Replies

In regards to Unit Consolidation Orders - are there Ohio state laws, ODNR laws regarding the establishment of Units, if so, please provide statues, court cases, etc.Does the Operator have total…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by john goodday May 13, 2012.

Unit Consolidation
2 Replies

Would the forum members please comment on Unit Consolidation.  Does one well hold an entire Unit which has consolidated various OGML's for an as long as production occurs?  Do the Consolidation of…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Farmhouse May 10, 2012.

Unitization - Rules & Regulations
2 Replies

What are the rules and regulations in regards to Unitization in OH & PA. (1) Do the respective states have any imput into the sharing of royalties amongst mineral owners? (2) Does the Oil &…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by 0l1a6laz7smpf Apr 9, 2012.

Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56
62 Replies

In regards to Wiseman vs. Potts and the dormant mineral statue -5301.56, what must the heirs of an old mineral reservation do at present time to preserve their mineral rights, absent the surface…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Marc Apr 3.

Gifts Received

Gift

john goodday has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

john goodday's Page

Latest Activity

Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"The debate is over whether recitals of prior reservations fall within the subject of the title transaction, not whether instant reservations to a third party are void. Dodd v. Croskey says yes, and Wendt v. Dickerson says no. IMHO, Croskey is right,…"
Apr 3
QQQ replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Can anyone tell me if a recorded lease is a title transaction, or saving event, as it applies to ORC 5301.56?"
Apr 3
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Jay: Stop harassing me."
Apr 2
jesse replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Private property shall ever be held inviolate, but subservient to the public welfare. When taken in time of war or other public exigency, imperatively requiring its immediate seizure or for the purpose of making or repairing roads, which shall be…"
Apr 1
Susan Tribett replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Do you ride the short bus?"
Mar 30
M Thomas replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"US Supreme Court - Texaco v Short on "automatic abandonment" In 1971 the Indiana Legislature enacted a statue providing that served mineral interest that in not used for a period of 20 years automatically lapses and reverts to the…"
Mar 30
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"So clearly, you're familiar with the most recent decision on the Wiseman case? You can read both decisions here. It's the one place online I've found with both Wiseman decisions side by side."
Mar 28
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
""no real legal clue"? Perhaps you should take a mulligan like the Wiseman v. Potts judge and proofread and edit your posts before the 15 minutes expires."
Mar 28
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"what speaks volumes is that their was zero confusion about who owns what until very recently.  and what it tells you is that some big city law firms, who prioritize drumming up business above all else, see peddling implausible constructions of…"
Mar 28
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Agreed Marc, Jay is one of those people who ruins these discussion boards for everybody. Only worse than being uninformed is being extremely confident in your own misinformation."
Mar 28
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Trial judges are wrong all the time. Why else do you suppose we have appellate courts M Thomas? The Wiseman decision (which has been vacated) and the one from Noble County are shorter in combined length than a high school book report. Literally,…"
Mar 28
Marcus Grayson replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Listen Troll, that conversation proves that you're a liar and your hatred of opposing opinions obscures your ability to think.  Pad fees were $15,000 at the time.  That was a fact and no amount of kicking and screaming will change…"
Mar 28
M Thomas replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"I'll repeat this here - Three separate judges in three different counties have concluded that a mere mention of a previous reservation does not constitute being the "subject of a title transaction", and thus a saving event. They all…"
Mar 28
M Thomas replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"Three separate judges in three different counties have concluded that a mere mention of a previous reservation does not constitute being the "subject of a title transaction", and thus a saving event. They all can't be wrong. Dodd v…"
Mar 28
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"LOL nothing in the Dodd case requires you to track down heirs from deaths in the early 1900s. it seems to me you have a tenuous handle of what the DMA and the various trial court decisions actually say. the leasor in the Dodd case had no problem…"
Mar 28
Marc replied to john goodday's discussion 'Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56'
"you see that's wrong. if that was the intent they would have written the minerals "vest" or "shall vest" - BUT they didnt write that. P.S. a fundamental part of statutory interpretation is the assumption that every word has…"
Mar 28

Profile Information

What is your role in the Marcellus?
Gas Professional
Why are you here?
Learning
Which state(s) are you following?
N/A

Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Go Marcellus & Utica Shale: Leasing, Drilling & Mineral Rights to add comments!

Join Go Marcellus & Utica Shale: Leasing, Drilling & Mineral Rights

At 9:39am on October 13, 2009, Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) said…
Welcome to GoMarcellusShale.com. I hope this is a site where you can dive in and begin contributing. Please be sure to check out our county groups and see if there is a county you can participate in. Have fun "shaling."

Keith
Site Publisher
 
 
 

advertisements