Tags:
Thanks. I ll try and look into it more and I'm going back to odnr s page and look again who's receiving royalties from that one lateral.. Also this is CHK were dealing with is their anyway they can do it the way I described . Is this situation like yours ?
Thanks for the info. I give up on calling CHK. I've left messages 8 times last week about a different matter and no one calls. Heck I'd be happy to be on hold with them. Haha now I'm going to do more checking into this. You have my hopes up now but I know better. Thanks for putting me in my place.. I ll see what I can find out
Yes I already have all that paperwork that shows everyone's acres in the 633 acre production unit. It shows what every landowner contributes acre wise. But they put together the 137 acre drilling unit and on the permit it shows everyone who will get royalties and its only the ones that the lateral goes through or close to. So in my eyes and other people I ve talked to I won't receive royalties or I would have been listed as a person that will receive royalties. I hope your write Kathleen but I don't think I am that lucky
This thread has raised a question from me, they're trying to get us to sign a pooling amendment (from less than 640 to 1280).
Right now there is a well permitted and we're in a unit... but the unit is bigger than our lease allows. There are no other wells on us (vertical or otherwise). Is this still something they can do, do they prefer to do it this way if you don't sign?
Can we be thrown in a small production unit?
I just read this thread for the first time, and wow is this confusing. I have friends with large acreages who are HBP by Oxford/Eclipse and have leases that only allow 160 acres as a maximum pool size. All of them have been approached by the company to sign an addendum to increase this (for pennies). My question is: Can Eclipse get around the pooling restriction (and the landowner's demands for fair compensation) by splitting the acreage into separate units (drilled from a common pad), where each "unit" is less than or equal to 160 acres? I doubt it, or Eclipse would just go ahead and do it, rather than offering them any money at all, and taking the time to send a guy out to hassle them. Sounds like a question for the attorney. Comments?
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com