Middlesex Twp. Zoneing Challange Geyer Well et al

All things pertaining to Middlesex Twp gas drilling activities or lack thereof.

Views: 10453

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by FairMktValue on June 5, 2015 at 4:08pm

Strange, marked "private video".

Why would you not want people to see your "message" ???

Permalink Reply by LH on June 5, 2015 at 4:46pm

That's what I was thinking.

Permalink Reply by RB on June 5, 2015 at 7:21am
Very good information. Thanks Cat & all.
Permalink Reply by LH on June 5, 2015 at 12:50pm

So many different articles out there about this situation

http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2015/06/05/butler-county-ga...

Permalink Reply by deer spotter on June 5, 2015 at 4:52pm

Cat and Fair MKTValue  Being from Venango Co. do not have all the info. How ever do try to follow all cases in this area as we had a similar case in our area. First challenge Delaware River 501c looks very questionable. Second it is my understanding this case was challenged and ruled in favor of Rex, If this is the case than Delaware River and the  Mars Parent group need to be held financial responsible for cost incurred by leased landowners and Rex Energy. Make them anti up called escrow accounts for when they loose the appeal landowners and Rex can recover expenses. Depends on the area minerals can be valued  anywhere  from $10,000.00 to 24,000.00 per acre, over the life of a well, for one strata. Good luck!!!

Permalink Reply by Middlesex Resident on June 9, 2015 at 11:59am

Yesterday, the anti's filed their appeal in Butler County to the Middlesex Twp. zoning decision.  No surprise there.  Not sure if that will stop the activity at the Geyer well or not.

 

Permalink Reply by LH on June 9, 2015 at 12:43pm

I just drove by today and the wall is up.    Will get interesting with all these lawsuits going on in this township.   

Permalink Reply by LH on June 9, 2015 at 3:31pm

You hit the nail on the head Matthew.  There are a few articles I posted above as well as others about the leaseholder's lawsuit.

It's always "we are willing to talk but only if you tell us what we want to hear"

Permalink Reply by LH on June 9, 2015 at 3:34pm

I wanted to pm you Matthew so I requested to be your friend.

Permalink Reply by LH on June 9, 2015 at 9:39pm
Permalink Reply by LH on June 9, 2015 at 10:16pm

This article has nothing to do with drilling but another farm being sold to build a housing development on 228.  So much for that rural area especially since the Anti-drillers are always complaining that they moved to this area because it was so rural. 

http://thecranberryeagle.com/article/20150608/CRAN05/150609950/-1/C...

Permalink Reply by DG on June 10, 2015 at 7:55am

This is great....the anti's also throw out there they don't want the truck traffic, noise, dust, exhaust etc from well site activity but are totally fine with living in a housing plan that has this same traffic directly in front of their house for a longer period of time then its going to take for them to drill, complete, and tie in the wells on the pad, (in a perfect world all three operations should take a few months depending on how many wells they are drilling on the pad) Operators have reduced the amount of days it takes to drill a lateral from surface to bottom hole. So all in all the activity on the pad could all be done and over with by the time school is in session. Then once school starts back up in Sept they would only have well tenders going out the site.

But I totally agree that the moment someone pushes back for their rights to have their land developed, its like "how dare you"

 

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service