Tioga SWEPI Stacked Pays

Just as Shell/SWEPI lists 26 prospective target formations on a single well in Western PA, I suspect they are doing similar testing of about that many formations on a well or wells in Tioga County.

Views: 4873

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Janice L. Hancharick on March 4, 2014 at 9:42am

Take your point up w/the writers of Potter County Today ... posted as "Timely news from the Potter County Government."  Then go straight to MCOR and check in with them.  I  had "heard and read" that production was down across much of the nation due to the harsh winter. Does that fit in w/any bits of info you're striving to get across?  If you are attempting to get in a similar tone of conversation as you had above with Tim, you'll have it alone.

Permalink Reply by Jack Young on March 4, 2014 at 9:52am

Why not answer my question?  You say you do your "darnedest to be a reliable source" and here's your opportunity to show that. Surely you've seen the production figures - the weather didn't seem to have slowed down many of Cabot's top rated Marcellus wells.  

Permalink Reply by Chris Crawley on March 5, 2014 at 9:22am

Janice,

FYI, I checked the last PA Production report for Shell in Tioga Co..found only one (1) well in production for 43 days..It's listed on line #5604 of the report, permit # 117-21538, Gee C832-2V, Middlebury Twp..Status-RINAC- 342,697.3 MCF in 43 days..or 342,697.3/43=7969.7 per day equals 7967.7x180=1,434,546.8 MCF for six mos. assuming the production was constant for the entire six month period.

Permalink Reply by Mick maag on March 4, 2014 at 9:39am

Thanks for the info David  

Permalink Reply by Area Man on March 5, 2014 at 6:32am

To the original post, which document are all these formations listed?  I'd be keen to take a look!  Can someone provide a link?

 

Cheers,

-AreaMan

Permalink Reply by Philip Thackray on March 5, 2014 at 7:34am

See attached pages 49 and above

Attachments:
Permalink Reply by Charles Randolph on March 5, 2014 at 11:25am

Thanks, Phil :))))

Permalink Reply by Paul D Ettari on March 5, 2014 at 10:10am

To Dave P, about 10 yrs ago before all the interest in the Marcellus I talked with one of the state geologists about the Trenton Blackriver formation. although very deep (I believe in the 10-15000 ft range) he was very excited about it and even mentioned it as a possible oil play. There have been some very successful wells  around Elkins WV area. I would love to hear your thoughts about it if you have any knowledge you are willing to share

Permalink Reply by David Perotto on March 5, 2014 at 2:25pm

Paul,

I read this study a couple of years ago:

http://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/895657

Page 95 has the conclusions and may be "cliff notes" for the report. The Trenton Black River, according to the authors of this, has economic potential. The caveat is that it needs further study. With its relatively deep location, I wonder if it isn't "overcooked". More investigation will reveal its potential. I read somewhere (maybe this very report) that the source rock (for NY southern tier) could be the Utica or some other, unknown deeper strata. Keep your eye on the TBR, it may yield gas someday.

Dave

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service